What this category's data looks like
This page is for primary and secondary school admissions organizations. The core materials include the admissions plan, the application materials checklist, and the admission list. The admissions plan is usually published annually and includes the admissions scope, time nodes, and admission rules; the application materials checklist is updated in sync with the plan and lists fields such as household registration, property, and student status, as well as signature fields; the admission list is formed after the batch ends and includes student names, ID numbers, admission categories, and receipt status. When these three types of materials enter the knowledge base retrieval node, each plays a different role: the admissions plan provides the rule basis, the application materials checklist provides the baseline for field and date comparison, and the admission list provides the result record and the object for verifying signed receipts. The update cadence of materials is driven by policy adjustments and batch nodes. It is common for the same record to have mismatched names, quantities, or dates across two materials, unsynchronized versions, missing signatures or receipts, and other such situations, requiring exception tracing and manual review.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node. It outputs an array of cited content, each item containing the original text snippet and source identifier, and the length can be 0. The "exception list and review conclusion" is completed afterward by a subsequent AI node, code node, or manual work. Even if no content is retrieved, the output chain still runs through.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions plan | Whether the admissions scope, time nodes, and admission rules fields in the plan, as well as the publication date and signature fields, are complete, and whether the names, quantities, and dates of the corresponding records in the application materials checklist and admission list are consistent | In the node, check the selected knowledge base collections and their vector models; open the search parameter panel and check each item; run a test query with no matching materials to see whether the output is empty while the chain continues |
| Application materials checklist | Whether fields such as household registration, property, and student status, as well as dates and signature fields, in the checklist match those in the admissions plan and admission list, whether versions are synchronized, and whether missing signatures or receipts are recorded | In the conversation, open the citation markers and compare against the source documents; check whether the number of items in the citation array in responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) matches the hit materials; check whether each citation in quoteList can point back to the original paragraph |
| Admission list | Whether the student names, ID numbers, admission categories, and receipt status in the list are consistent with the corresponding records in the admissions plan and application materials checklist, and whether dates and signatures are complete | Check that quoteMaxToken is the citation content budget, and record the number of array items separately without comparing for equality; run a test query with no matching materials to confirm that the array is empty while the chain runs through |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same record has mismatched names, quantities, or dates in the admissions plan and admission list. Cause: material versions are not synchronized, or field mapping is inconsistent during entry, requiring item-by-item comparison by pointing back to the original paragraph.
- Symptom: The application materials checklist lacks a signature or receipt, but the admission list shows it as completed. Cause: the signature field and receipt status were not updated with the batch, and the review did not verify support from the original record.
- Symptom: There are no citation markers in the answer, or there is an answer but the citation array is empty. Cause: no materials were hit in this round, or the cited snippets do not match the original text, so first check the hit situation and then look at trimming.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: ask a question with source support, check whether the citation array and markers can point back to the original text, and check that the number of citations in responseData matches the hit materials; then ask a question with no matching materials and confirm that the array is empty while the chain runs through.
Business test: create an exception record, see whether it can be traced to the source material, check whether the fields, dates, and signatures of the admissions plan, application materials checklist, and admission list match, and whether the cited snippets can point back to the original text.
- In the node, check the selected knowledge base collections and their vector models, open the search parameter panel, and check each value item by item.
- In the conversation, open the citation markers, compare against the source documents, and check whether each citation in
quoteListcan point back to the original paragraph.