What this category's data looks like
This category's data covers three types of materials: talent cultivation plans, course standards, and job competency analysis tables. The talent cultivation plan is the master document, specifying the major name, program duration, cultivation objectives, and course structure; the course standard is the execution basis at the course level, stating the course name, credit hours and credits, and assessment methods; the job competency analysis table comes from industry research, listing job names, competency items, and corresponding courses. The three types of materials must be consistent with one another in names, quantities, dates, and signatures; any field that does not match forms a clue for an exception. Materials are updated on a rolling basis with major adjustments, industry research, and teaching revisions; old versions must retain a trace and be marked as invalid. When entering the exception tracing and manual review stage, the talent cultivation plan provides the major and course framework, the course standard provides the basis for credit hours and assessment, and the job competency analysis table provides the mapping between jobs and competencies; the three serve as references for one another, used to locate the specific inconsistent fields and their sources.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the HTTP node in the workflow, outputting the response body, status code, and returned fields. The exception list and review conclusions are parsed from the response by subsequent nodes, or handled by an external system according to the agreement to complete the rest. The HTTP node is only responsible for sending requests to the target address; it does not replace the external system in writing to the database or approving.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Talent cultivation plan | The major name, course name, program duration, and signature date must be consistent with the course standard; if the signature or receipt is missing, it is judged as an exception | Check the placeholder sources in the variable panel, and confirm that the request body fields are consistent with the external interface agreement |
| Course standard | The course name, credit hours and credits, and assessment methods correspond to the entries in the job competency analysis table; if the quantities and dates do not match, it is judged as an exception | Use one sample request to compare the returned fields, and check the records in responseData against the original materials |
| Job competency analysis table | The job names, competency items, and corresponding courses must be synchronized with the talent cultivation plan; if the version is not synchronized, it is judged as an exception | Check the request header names and value sources, and confirm that Authorization is passed in according to the external system's requirements |
| HTTP node request | The placeholder variables in all three places—path parameters, request body, and request headers—can be resolved into actual values | View the fully rendered address in the request preview, and check the source of each placeholder in variables |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name or credit hours of the same course do not match between the talent cultivation plan and the course standard. Cause: The two materials were revised separately, without field-level comparison and synchronization.
- Symptom: The job competency analysis table has been updated, but the talent cultivation plan still references the old competency items. Cause: The versions are not synchronized, lacking invalidation marking and receipt confirmation.
- Symptom: The review conclusion lacks a signature or receipt, and the exception record cannot be traced back to the source material. Cause: The review step did not retain the original records and signing credentials.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: preview the rendered request, check the status code and returned fields, then compare the responseData result against one sample, and confirm that the sources of Authorization and variables are traceable.
Business test: create one exception record, see whether it can be traced back to the source material, and confirm that the four items—name, quantity, date, and signature—are traceable.
- Check each placeholder source in the variable panel, and confirm that the path parameters, request body, and request header fields are consistent with the external interface agreement.
- Use one sample request to compare the returned fields, record the number of array entries and the referenced text tokens, and check the number of references and the budget respectively.