What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the enterprise new employee onboarding training scenario, with materials drawn from three categories: onboarding training plans, course sign-in sheets, and job descriptions. The onboarding training plan is updated by the training lead in batches and includes course names, planned dates, participating positions, and a signature field for the responsible person; the course sign-in sheet is registered by the mentor or training executor per session and includes the sign-in date, trainee name, course name, and the trainee's own signature; the job description is maintained by the hiring department and includes the position name, responsibility items, qualification requirements, and the department head's signature. The three material types have different field conventions: the plan focuses on the correspondence between courses and dates, the sign-in sheet focuses on the correspondence between personnel and sessions, and the job description focuses on the correspondence between positions and responsibilities. When the materials enter workflow orchestration, the plan serves as the baseline for exception tracing, the sign-in sheet serves as the execution receipt, and the job description serves as the basis for position attribution; after cross-comparison of the three, they form the original record support for the exception list and review conclusions.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the workflow node (user selection and branching), outputting the branch direction and interaction state records. The "exception list and review conclusions" are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution along the branch. When the user selection node is triggered, the conversation enters the interaction state and records the workflow state; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Onboarding training plan | Whether the course name, planned date, participating positions, and responsible person's signature are consistent with the sign-in sheet | Compare the course names, dates, and signature fields of the plan and the sign-in sheet item by item, and confirm that the field conventions and versions are synchronized |
| Course sign-in sheet | Whether the sign-in date, trainee name, course name, and the trainee's own signature correspond to the position attribution in the job description | Check the position names, headcount, and dates of the sign-in sheet and the job description by session, and inspect for missing signatures or receipts |
| Job description | Whether the position name, responsibility items, and department head's signature are consistent with the participating positions in the training plan | Check the position names and version numbers of the job description and the training plan, and confirm that the department head's signature is complete |
| User selection node | Each option corresponds to one branch, and the interaction state is recorded | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, trigger it once to view the node status in the run record, and reference variables in subsequent nodes for a trial run |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name or date of the same course does not match between the training plan and the sign-in sheet. Cause: The two materials are maintained by different personnel, their update rhythms are not synchronized, and there is no unified field convention.
- Symptom: The version of the job description is not synchronized, and the responsibility items are inconsistent with the participating positions in the training plan. Cause: After revision by the hiring department, it was not returned to the training lead, and the material version numbers were not checked.
- Symptom: The sign-in sheet lacks the trainee's own signature or receipt, and the review conclusion cannot be traced back to the source material. Cause: The mentor or training executor did not register the signature field per session, and the receipt was not archived.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Run trials option by option, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run record, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, and check whether variables has been passed to subsequent nodes and whether the node status corresponding to nodeId has been recorded.
Business test: Create an exception record, see whether it can be traced back to the source material, confirm that the exception has original record support and a reviewer's signature, and submit it to the responsible person for handling.
- In the user selection node, check the options and branch connections one by one, trigger the interaction once, and then view the node status and
nodeIdin the run record. - Reference
variablesin a subsequent node for one trial run, confirm that the selection result variable has been passed, and then compare the names, dates, and signatures of the training plan, sign-in sheet, and job description.