What this category's data looks like
This category's data covers three types of materials: business cooperation agreements, advertising review forms, and distribution cooperation materials. Agreements record the partner name, cooperation period, revenue-sharing ratio, signing date, and signatures of both parties; advertising review forms record the advertiser, issue number, number of pages, review comments, and reviewer signature; distribution cooperation materials record the distribution channel, delivery quantity, receipt date, and handler signature. Materials are updated on a rolling basis by issue and contract cycle, with fields consisting mainly of names, quantities, dates, and signatures. When entering the exception tracing and manual review function, the agreement provides the baseline fields, the advertising review form provides the publication-side quantities and review traces, and the distribution cooperation materials provide the channel-side quantities and receipt traces; the three serve as mutual sources of comparison for determining whether the same record is consistent.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, which output the range of historical messages referenced and the answer constraints. Memory turns control how many preceding turns of dialogue are referenced at most when answering; too small a value fails to use prior context, while too large a value brings in irrelevant content and increases consumption. The exception list and review conclusions are then completed by the model.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Business cooperation agreement | Whether the name, date, and signature match those in the advertising review form and distribution cooperation materials | Retrieve the original agreement, verify the partner name, signing date, and signatures of both parties, and compare the corresponding fields in the other two materials |
| Advertising review form | Whether the issue number, number of pages, and review signature are consistent with the agreement and distribution materials | Retrieve the review form by issue, verify the quantity and reviewer signature, and compare item by item with the agreement's revenue-sharing clauses and the distribution receipt quantities |
| Distribution cooperation materials | Whether the delivery quantity, receipt date, and handler signature are consistent with the agreement and review form | Retrieve the distribution receipt, verify the channel name, delivery quantity, and receipt date, and trace back to the corresponding records in the agreement and review form |
| Multi-turn dialogue and prompts | Whether the second-round follow-up can carry forward the references from the first round and give a traceable conclusion | Check the memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive rounds of questions, and check whether the answer constraints take effect |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name and quantity of the same cooperation record do not match between the agreement and the distribution materials. Cause: The two materials are entered separately, there is no unified comparison step, and discrepancies are not flagged.
- Symptom: The version of the advertising review form is not synchronized, and the issue number and number of pages are still old values. Cause: After the materials are updated, the associated records are not written back, and the historical version continues to be referenced.
- Symptom: The distribution cooperation materials lack the handler signature or receipt, and the review conclusion cannot be attributed to a responsible person. Cause: The receipt flow is not closed-loop, and the signature step is skipped.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: with two consecutive rounds of follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries forward the references from the first question, and whether the answer gives a traceable conclusion according to the prompt constraints; check whether chatId, messages, and variables are correctly carried in with each turn.
Business test: create an exception record, see whether the source material can be traced, and check whether the exception list and review conclusion correspond to the original record and signature.
- Check the current value of memory turns in the application settings, match it against the range of prior context required by the question, and compare the usage records of two runs.
- Extract one each of the agreement, advertising review form, and distribution cooperation materials by issue, verify the name, quantity, date, and signature item by item, and register discrepancies as an exception list.