What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the kindergarten game activity organization scenario. The materials come from observation records, area plans, material placement lists, and activity reflections. Observation records and area plans must correspond item by item; the quantity of materials placed must match the area needs in the plan; evidence of activity goal achievement must be extracted from observations; and reflections must be converted into next week's plan. When these materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, each has a different role: observation records and area plans serve as historical messages whose reference scope is controlled by the number of memory turns; material placement quantities serve as verifiable objects for judging whether materials are sufficient; and activity goal achievement and reflection-to-next-week-plan serve as answer constraints written into the prompt. The update rhythm is weekly: after each activity, observations and reflections are updated, and next week's plan is completed before the weekend. Field characteristics include area name, material name and quantity, goal description, observation facts, reflection conclusions, and next week's adjustments. External entry points and authorization scope are handled by the publishing service and file permissions; multi-turn dialogue is only responsible for organizing answers within the authorized visible scope.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the referenced historical message scope and answer constraints. The externally available entry points and authorization scope are determined by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model only processes filtered materials. The model answers accordingly; external entry points and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions, while memory turns and prompts do not generate access entry points and do not perform identity or file authentication.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Memory turns | Matches the range of prior context required by the question | Check the current value in the application settings, and run a trial with two consecutive follow-up questions to observe whether the second round carries forward the references from the first round |
| Observation records and area plans | The area activity facts in the observation records correspond item by item to the goals, materials, and play methods in the area plans | Extract one observation record and compare it against the goals and material placement quantities in the area plan to see whether they are consistent |
| Material placement quantity | The placement quantity meets the minimum requirement for the number of simultaneous participants in that area according to the area plan | List the material list and quantities according to the area plan, and compare them with the actual usage in the observation records |
| Activity goal achievement and reflection-to-next-week-plan | Activity goal achievement is supported by observation evidence, and reflection conclusions enter next week's plan and are updated | Check whether the reflection record states next week's adjustments, and verify whether next week's plan has updated the corresponding area |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: Insufficient quantities of area materials, causing children to wait or compete. Cause: The placement quantity was not configured according to the number of simultaneous participants in the area plan, and the observation records do not correspond to the plan.
- Phenomenon: Activity goals do not match the observation records; the goal is written as achieved but there is no evidence in the observations. Cause: The goal description is disconnected from the observation facts, and the reflection is not based on observations.
- Phenomenon: Next week's plan is not updated and still follows last week's arrangements. Cause: Reflection conclusions were not transferred into next week's plan, and the plan is disconnected from the observation records.
How to verify the setup
This feature acceptance: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question carries forward the references from the first question; at the same time, check the referenced historical message scope in messages and the session record corresponding to chatId, and confirm that variables are replaced as expected in the prompt.
Business test: Access once with a restricted identity and see whether the visible scope matches the setting, and whether unauthorized content is invisible.
- Check the memory turns value in the application settings, and run a trial with two consecutive follow-up questions to confirm that the second round correctly carries forward the references from the first round.
- Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that consumption changes accordingly after adjusting the number of turns, and check that the opening message is not treated as prior context.