What this category's data looks like
Kindergarten operation behavior and quality self-assessment materials usually include three types: self-assessment reports, issue lists, and rectification plans. The self-assessment report records the achievement status of aspects such as operating conditions, safety and hygiene, care and education, faculty and staff team, and internal management, and is attached with the form completion date and the principal's signature; the issue list lists the specific matters found in the investigation item by item, marking the responsible person and the rectification deadline; the rectification plan corresponds to the issue list and gives measures, completion dates, and acceptance signatures. These materials are updated on a school-year or semester rhythm, filled in by the kindergarten's self-assessment team, reviewed by the principal, and then submitted to higher authorities or disclosed to parents. When the materials enter multi-turn dialogue and prompt features, the self-assessment report serves as the background basis, the issue list serves as the source of to-do items, and the rectification plan serves as the progress reference; together the three support continuous follow-up questions and answer constraints. Field characteristics are concentrated in names, quantities, dates, and signature receipts, and consistency among the materials must be maintained.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The externally available entry points and authorization scope are determined by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model only processes filtered materials. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering; if the value is too small, the preceding text cannot be used, and if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Memory turns | Matches the range of preceding text required by the question | Check the current value in the application settings, and run a trial with two consecutive questions to observe whether the second round picks up the reference from the first round |
| Self-assessment report | Names, quantities, dates, and signatures are consistent across the materials | Check item by item against the issue list and rectification plan for names, quantities, dates, and signature receipts, and check whether the referenced content in messages is synchronized |
| Issue list | The names, quantities, and dates of the same record match in the two materials | Extract several entries and compare the self-assessment report with the rectification plan to confirm the versions are not misaligned, and record the number of references in the conversation corresponding to chatId |
| Rectification plan | Missing signatures or receipts can be identified | Check whether completion dates and acceptance signatures are complete, and check whether the fields passed in through variables are consistent with the paper materials |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The names, quantities, or dates of the same issue do not match in the two materials. Cause: The self-assessment report and the rectification plan are filled in separately, no cross-check is done, and the versions are not synchronized.
- Phenomenon: The rectification plan lacks signatures or receipts, and this is discovered by parents or higher authorities when it is publicly disclosed. Cause: The review step does not confirm the signature fields and receipt attachments item by item.
- Phenomenon: When the second question uses a reference, the answer does not address the question, or the answer becomes slower and consumption rises. Cause: The memory turns value does not match the range of the preceding text, and the opening message is treated as preceding text.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question picks up the reference from the first question; at the same time, check the referenced historical message range in messages and the number of references in the conversation corresponding to chatId, and confirm that the fields passed in through variables are consistent with the materials.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity and see whether the visible range matches the setting, and whether unauthorized content is invisible.
- Check the current value of memory turns in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and compare the usage records of the two runs.
- Compare the self-assessment report, issue list, and rectification plan, check names, quantities, dates, and signature receipts item by item, and confirm that the versions are synchronized.