What this category's data looks like
Primary and secondary school admissions organizations have fixed positions for fields, dates, and signatures across three types of materials: admission plans, application material checklists, and admission lists. Admission plans often include admission scope, time nodes, and signatures and seals; application material checklists list items such as household registration, real estate, and residence permits along with corresponding quantities; admission lists include names, batches, dates, and receipt signatures. Material sources are mostly school-level summaries or higher-level distributions, and the update rhythm is concentrated before and after the admissions season. It is common for the same record to have mismatched names, quantities, and dates across two materials, unsynchronized versions, and missing signatures or receipts. When entering the form input node, the three types of materials each play different roles: the admission plan provides the basis for the authorization scope of the external entry point, the application material checklist corresponds to fields collected item by item, and the admission list is used for subsequent verification and receipt confirmation.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the form input node (interaction node) in the workflow, which outputs the field values filled in by the user (passed to subsequent nodes after submission). The external entry point and authorization scope are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually. After the form input node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow state. After the user fills in the required items and submits, the form information is passed to subsequent nodes for use.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Admission plan | Admission scope, time nodes, signatures and seals are consistent with the external authorization scope, and versions are synchronized | Check field names one by one in the node configuration, and confirm they correspond one-to-one with the admission plan fields |
| Application material checklist | Items such as household registration, real estate, and residence permits and their quantities are consistent between the checklist and the form fields | Check the required settings one by one, and confirm that key material fields are marked as required |
| Admission list | Names, batches, dates, and receipt signatures match between the two materials | Reference this field in subsequent nodes and run a test to confirm that the corresponding field value can be retrieved after submission |
| formInput | Submission is not allowed when required items are empty, and the conversation does not stall due to the interactive state | Access once with a restricted identity and see whether the visible scope matches the settings |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match between the admission plan and the admission list. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, without field-level comparison and version synchronization.
- Symptom: The application material checklist has been updated, but the form fields are still the old version, causing subsequent nodes to retrieve old values after submission. Cause: Versions are not synchronized, and signature or receipt confirmation is missing.
- Symptom: After submission, subsequent nodes cannot retrieve values, or submission is still possible when required items are empty. Cause: Field names were not checked item by item, and the required markers and transfer path were not test-run.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: Fill it out once and submit, check the field values retrieved by subsequent nodes, and confirm that the formInput output is consistent with what was filled in.
Business test: Access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the settings, and confirm that unauthorized access is not visible.
- Check field names one by one in the node configuration, and confirm they correspond one-to-one with the fields of the admission plan, application material checklist, and admission list.
- Check the required settings one by one, and reference the
formInputResultfield values in subsequent nodes for a test run; if a selection scope is needed, check whether the visible scope ofuserSelectmatches the settings.