What this category's data looks like
The materials on this page come from the daily operations of compulsory education dropout prevention and schooling guarantee: dropout risk ledgers, persuasion-to-return records, and home visit records. The ledger fields include student name, grade, risk level, determination date, and signature; the persuasion-to-return records include persuasion time, participants, result, and receipt; the home visit records include home visit date, teacher, and parent signature. The materials are updated weekly or per event. The same record often has inconsistent names, quantities, and dates across two materials, versions are not synchronized, and signatures or receipts are missing. When entering the multi-turn dialogue and prompts feature, the ledger is responsible for risk identification and roster verification, the persuasion-to-return records are responsible for process tracing, and the home visit records are responsible for corroborating home-school communication; together, the three constrain the scope of answers and prevent different materials from being mixed into the same fact.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The externally available entry points and authorization scope are determined by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model only processes filtered materials. The model answers accordingly, while external entry points and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Dropout risk ledger | Whether the fields, dates, and signatures are consistent with the persuasion-to-return records | Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive follow-up questions, and see whether the second question inherits the reference from the first; check the messages range corresponding to chatId |
| Persuasion-to-return records | Whether the names, quantities, and dates match the home visit records | Access once with a restricted identity and see whether the visible range matches the setting; check the date and signature fields brought in by variables |
| Home visit records | Whether receipts and signatures are complete and whether versions are synchronized | Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm the changes in the content brought in after adjusting the number of turns; check whether messages is mixed with opening messages |
| Multi-turn dialogue and prompts configuration | Whether the referenced historical message range and answer constraints match the prior context range required by the question | Check the memory turns in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and confirm that the second question correctly inherits the reference from the first round |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same student's name and date do not match between the ledger and the persuasion-to-return records. Cause: The two materials are updated separately, versions are not synchronized, and a unified receipt is lacking.
- Phenomenon: The home visit records lack a parent signature or receipt, and the persuasion-to-return result cannot be corroborated. Cause: Signatures were not fully collected during the material circulation process, and completeness verification was not performed at the time of archiving.
- Phenomenon: When the second question uses a reference, the answer is off-topic, responses become slower, and consumption increases. Cause: The memory turns are too large and bring in irrelevant prior context, or opening messages are treated as prior context.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question inherits the reference from the first; at the same time, check the historical range and variable inclusion corresponding to the three identifiers chatId, messages, and variables.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity and see whether the visible range matches the setting; unauthorized content is not visible, and the entry points and authorization scope open to parents or superiors match the identity.
- Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and confirm that the second question correctly inherits the reference from the first round.
- Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm the changes in the content brought in and consumption after adjusting the number of turns, and check whether
messagesis mixed with opening messages.