Multi-Turn Conversation and Prompts for District Teaching Research and Classroom Reviews: Manage Authorized Access and External Services

Teaching Reviews: review conversation for authorized access. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

District and county teaching research activities and classroom observation and evaluation materials mainly include three types: teaching research activity notices, classroom observation records, and classroom evaluation minutes. Notices are issued by the teaching research office and contain the activity name, date, location, participation scope, and receipt requirements; classroom observation records are filled in by the observer and contain the class, period, teacher, observation points, and signature; classroom evaluation minutes are compiled by the evaluation group and contain review opinions, conclusions, and signatures. Materials are updated according to the activity cycle: notices are issued first, records are generated during the class, and minutes are archived after the activity. Field characteristics are concentrated in four items: name, quantity, date, and signature. When the three types of materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, their roles differ: notices serve as the basis for the external entry point, classroom observation records serve as process materials, and classroom evaluation minutes serve as conclusion materials. The external entry point and authorization scope are handled by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model answers only based on these.

Configuration and implementation checks

This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The externally available entry point and authorization scope are determined by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model only processes filtered materials. The finished output is answered by the model based on this, and the external entry point and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions.

ObjectCheckVerification action
Teaching research activity noticeName, date, participation scope, and receipt requirements are consistent in the two materialsRetrieve the original notice and the archive directory, and check whether the activity name, date, quantity, and receipt signature correspond
Classroom observation recordClass, period, teacher, and signature are consistent in the record and the minutesAccess once with a restricted identity, and check whether the record fields and signature receipt are within the visible scope
Classroom evaluation minutesReview opinions, conclusions, and signatures are synchronized in the minutes and the current round of materialsCompare the minutes version number and date, confirm that no old version is mixed in, and that signatures and receipts are complete
Multi-turn dialogue and promptsThe second question can carry forward the reference of the first question, and the historical range and constraints matchCheck the current values in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive rounds of questions, and record the transmission of chatId, messages, and variables

Three common errors

  • Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same classroom observation record do not match between the notice attachment and the classroom evaluation minutes. Cause: The two places were entered separately, without field comparison and receipt verification.
  • Phenomenon: The classroom evaluation minutes have been updated, but the external entry point still displays the old version. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the publishing service did not refresh the visible scope according to the latest signature receipt.
  • Phenomenon: When accessing with a restricted identity, records beyond authorization are visible. Cause: File permissions and authorization scope were not matched item by item according to the visitor's identity, and unauthorized content was not hidden.

How to verify the setup

Acceptance of this feature: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries forward the reference of the first question, and check whether the historical range in messages and the transmission of variables conform to the settings.

Business test: Access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope conforms to the settings, and that unauthorized content is not visible.

  • Check the current value of memory turns in the application settings, match it with the preceding context range required by the question, and after adjustment compare the usage records of two runs.
  • Retrieve the three materials: teaching research activity notice, classroom observation record, and classroom evaluation minutes, check name, quantity, date, and signature receipt item by item, and confirm that the versions are synchronized.