What this category's data looks like
Graduate training process management involves materials such as training plans, proposal reports, and mid-term assessment forms. The sources are supervisors, department secretaries, and the academic affairs system, and the update cadence advances by semester or by training stage. The training plan records course and credit arrangements, the proposal report carries the topic selection and justification, and the mid-term assessment form reflects stage progress and review comments. When these materials enter the forms and interaction feature, each has a different role: the training plan serves as the source of base fields, while the proposal report and mid-term assessment form serve as stage submission content, filled in and submitted by visitors according to their identity, after which subsequent nodes or manual handling determine the authorization scope and external services accordingly.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the form input node (interaction node) in the workflow, which outputs the field values filled in by the user (passed to subsequent nodes after submission). "Externally available entry points and authorization scope" are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually. After the form input node is triggered, the conversation enters an interaction state and the workflow state is recorded. After the user fills in the required items and submits, the form information is passed to subsequent nodes for use.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Training plan | Fields and dates must be aligned item by item with the proposal report and mid-term assessment form, and signatures and receipts must be complete | Check the field names in the node configuration, verify the required settings one by one, reference the fields after submission, and run a trial |
| Proposal report | The name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent across the two materials, and versions are synchronized | Check the field names and required markers, reference the field in subsequent nodes, and run a trial |
| Mid-term assessment form | Signatures or receipts are not missing, and dates match the training plan and proposal report | Check the required settings, access once with a restricted identity, and see whether the visible scope matches the settings |
| formInput | Field values can be retrieved by subsequent nodes after submission, and submission is not allowed when required fields are empty | Reference the field in subsequent nodes and run a trial, and check the field transfer after submission |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match across the two materials. Cause: The field sources are not unified, and items were not checked one by one before submission.
- Symptom: Versions are not synchronized, and old materials are still referenced. Cause: The update cadence is disconnected from the submission node, and materials are not refreshed by stage.
- Symptom: Signatures or receipts are missing, and the materials are incomplete. Cause: Required markers do not cover key fields, and there is no post-submission recheck.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: fill in and submit once, check the field values retrieved by subsequent nodes, and confirm that the fields corresponding to formInputResult and selectResult can be referenced.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity and see whether the visible scope matches the settings.
- Check the field names and required markers one by one in the node configuration to ensure that key material fields are marked as required.
- Reference the field in subsequent nodes and run a trial, check the field transfer after submission, and confirm that the conversation does not remain stuck in the interaction state.