What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of authorized access and external services for enterprise independent skill talent evaluation. The core category materials include the enterprise evaluation filing form, evaluation specifications, and candidate roster. The filing form comes from the human resources and social security filing receipt and stamped original, updated by batch; the evaluation specifications come from the enterprise skill level certification plan, adjusted with occupational direction; the roster comes from the registration system export, rolling by exam period. The three types of materials play different roles when entering the workflow: the filing form determines the evaluation scope and authorization level that can be opened, the evaluation specifications constrain the externally visible assessment modules and scoring criteria, and the roster provides visitor identity and the set of visible records. Field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, and signatures. The same candidate's name, ID number, and declared level in the two materials must be consistent, and batch dates and signature receipts must be traceable. After the materials enter the workflow, the user selection node first determines the access entry, and subsequent nodes then trim the visible fields according to the authorization scope, forming an external view open to parents or superiors.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction status records. "Externally available entries and authorization scope" are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. When a node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow status. After the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise evaluation filing form | The evaluation scope, batch date, and signature receipt in the filing form determine the authorization level that can be opened for external entries; the name, quantity, and date of the same batch in the filing form and roster must be aligned item by item | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, confirming that the authorization level corresponding to each option is consistent with the filing form; trigger once and view the node status in the run record |
| Evaluation specifications | The assessment modules, scoring criteria, and version number in the specifications determine the trimming boundary of externally visible fields; when the version is not synchronized, the old specification will open modules that should not be visible | Reference variables and nodeId in subsequent nodes and run a trial once, checking whether the visible fields fall within the range allowed by the specification version; record the specification version number and effective date |
| Candidate roster | The candidate identity, declared level, and batch in the roster determine the matching relationship between visitor identity and the set of visible records; batches missing signatures or receipts must not enter the external view | Access once with a restricted identity, checking whether the records corresponding to that identity in the roster match the authorization scope; unauthorized records should be invisible, and check the signature receipt field |
| User selection node | Each option corresponds to one branch, and options and branch connections must correspond one-to-one; selecting an option but still taking the default branch is a configuration error | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and reference variables and nodeId in subsequent nodes for a trial run, confirming that the branch direction is consistent with the interaction status record |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same candidate's name, declared level, or batch quantity does not match between the filing form and the roster, and two inconsistent records appear in the external view. Cause: The two materials were exported separately, and field alignment and deduplication by batch were not performed.
- Symptom: The evaluation specifications have been updated, but the externally visible modules are still opened according to the old version. Cause: The specification version was not synchronized to the workflow branch conditions, and the old specification continues to take effect.
- Symptom: A roster batch missing signatures or receipts still enters the external entry. Cause: The authorization scope determination did not treat signature receipts as an admission field, and missing items were not intercepted.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Run a trial for each option, check the branch direction and interaction status in the run record, and confirm that each option corresponds to one branch; reference variables and nodeId in subsequent nodes, and check whether the selection result is passed as expected.
Business test: Access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the setting, and unauthorized records should be invisible.
- Align the filing form, evaluation specifications, and roster by batch and version number, and check the name, quantity, date, and signature receipt fields item by item.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the user selection node, and after triggering once, view the node status and branch direction in the run record.