What this category's data looks like
In the modern apprenticeship and order class management scenario, materials entering the authorized access and external services function mainly fall into three categories: school-enterprise cooperation agreements, order class training plans, and master-apprentice records. School-enterprise cooperation agreements usually contain the partner enterprise name, major, program length, signing date, and signatures and seals of both parties, and are the top-level basis for the authorization scope and external entry point; order class training plans contain the class name, number of students, course modules, start and end dates, and departmental approval signature, and determine the externally visible training content; master-apprentice records contain the names of the master and apprentice, position, apprenticeship cycle, assessment results, and signed receipts from both parties, and are process-based traceability materials. The fields, dates, and signatures of the three types of materials must be aligned item by item, and the update rhythm rolls forward by semester or agreement cycle. After a new version enters the knowledge base, the old version should be marked simultaneously to avoid mismatches in names, quantities, and dates for the same record across two materials. When materials enter this function, each is retrieved by the retrieval node in the form of cited sources, for subsequent nodes to compare fields, write ledgers, and generate reports.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of cited content, each item containing the original text fragment and source identifier, and the length can be 0. "Externally available entry points and authorization scope" are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| School-enterprise cooperation agreement | Whether the name, quantity, date, and signatures are consistent with the order class training plan | In the knowledge base retrieval node, check the selected collection and vector model, open the citation corner mark to compare against the original agreement paragraphs, and compare fields and signature dates item by item |
| Order class training plan | Whether the class name, number of students, start and end dates, and approval signature match the master-apprentice records | Run a trial with a question that has no matching materials, confirm that the cited content array is empty while the chain continues, then check that the number of citations in responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) matches the hit materials |
| Master-apprentice record | Whether the names of the master and apprentice, position, apprenticeship cycle, assessment results, and receipt signatures are complete | Open the search parameter panel and check the values item by item, confirm that quoteMaxToken is the cited content budget, that the tokens of the cited text are recorded separately, and that the number of array items is not compared for equality |
| Cited content output | Whether each citation can point back to the original paragraph, and whether the source identifier is traceable | In the conversation, open the citation corner mark, compare against the source document, and check whether the cited fragment in quoteList corresponds to the original text |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the agreement and the training plan. Cause: The two materials are updated separately, without field-level comparison and version synchronization.
- Phenomenon: The apprenticeship record lacks a signature or receipt, and cannot be traced when displayed externally. Cause: Process materials are not collected by cycle, and the approval step leaves no trace.
- Phenomenon: The answer has content but the citation array is empty, or the cited fragment does not match the original text. Cause: No materials were hit in this round or the source identifier is misaligned, and it should not be directly attributed to length truncation.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this function: ask a question with original-text support, and check whether the cited content array and citation corner mark can point back to the original paragraph; then ask a question with no matching materials, and confirm that the array is empty while the output chain runs through.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity, and see whether the visible scope matches the setting, with unauthorized content not visible.
- In the knowledge base retrieval node, check whether the selected knowledge bases use the same vector model, and open the search parameter panel to check the values item by item.
- Run a trial with a question that has no matching materials, record the length of the cited content array and the
quoteMaxTokenbudget, and do not compare the two for equality.