What this category's data looks like
In the external service scenario of enterprise self-directed skilled talent evaluation, the materials center on the enterprise evaluation filing form, the evaluation specification, and the candidate roster. The filing form states the evaluation entity, occupational direction, and filing date; the evaluation specification defines the assessment modules, scoring, and signature fields; the roster records candidate names, ID numbers, declared levels, and batches. The three types of materials are usually updated by batch or by year, and their fields include institution name, occupation name, level, date, signature, and receipt. When entering the multi-turn conversation and prompts feature, the filing form and evaluation specification provide the rule boundaries on which answers are based, and the roster provides the personnel and batch scope; together the three determine the visible scope of authorized access and the external service position. Material versions and signature status must remain consistent with the publishing service and file permissions, to avoid differences in names, quantities, and dates for the same record between the filing form and the roster.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the app settings, and outputs the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The externally available entry points and authorization scope are determined by the publishing service and file permissions; the model only processes filtered materials, and the memory turns and prompts themselves do not generate access entry points and do not perform identity or file authentication.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Memory turns | Match the range of prior context required by the question; too few turns cannot use the prior context, while too many bring in irrelevant content and increase consumption | Check the current value in the app settings, and test-run with two consecutive questions |
| Enterprise evaluation filing form | The filing entity, occupational direction, level, and date must be consistent with the evaluation specification and roster, and signatures and receipts must be complete | Compare the institution name, occupation name, and date in the filing form and evaluation specification, and check the signature fields |
| Evaluation specification | The assessment modules, scoring criteria, and signature fields must be synchronized with the version of the filing form, and signatures or receipts must not be missing | Check the specification version number and the filing form date, and confirm that the receipt is retained |
| Candidate roster | Candidate names, ID numbers, declared levels, and batches must match the filing form and evaluation specification | Compare the names, quantities, and dates in the roster and filing form one by one, and check whether the versions are synchronized |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name or declared level of the same candidate does not match between the roster and the filing form. Cause: the two materials are maintained separately, and names, quantities, and dates are not checked uniformly by batch.
- Symptom: the evaluation specification has been updated, but the filing form still references the old version, causing deviations in the answer position. Cause: versions are not synchronized, and the publishing service and file permissions are not adjusted along with the material updates.
- Symptom: the filing form or evaluation specification lacks signatures or receipts, so the source of authorization cannot be proven during external services. Cause: the signature and receipt steps are not closed, and material archiving is incomplete.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: test-run with two consecutive follow-up questions, use a reference in the second question, see whether the answer carries on from the first question, and check whether the referenced historical message range in messages and variables are consistent with the settings.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the setting, and confirm that unauthorized content is not visible.
- Check the memory turns value in the app settings, compare the usage records of two runs, and confirm that the session corresponding to
chatIddoes not treat the opening message as prior context. - Compare the fields, dates, and signatures of the enterprise evaluation filing form, evaluation specification, and candidate roster, and check item by item whether names, quantities, and versions are consistent.