What this category's data looks like
This category's data involves three core types of materials: study abroad service contracts, school application forms, and personal statements. The contract states the scope of services, fees, and the signature dates of both parties; the application form contains the institution name, major, intake term, and submission receipt; the personal statement reflects the version, word count, and final signed approval. Materials are submitted by the consultant, confirmed by the parent, and reviewed by the supervisor, with the update cadence advancing according to application rounds and institution deadlines. When entering the authorized access and external services function, the contract serves as the basis for the authorization scope, the application form serves as the credential for matching identity and visibility scope, and the personal statement serves as the object of citation traceability. Field characteristics center on four items: name, quantity, date, and signature. The same record across two materials is prone to inconsistent names, mismatched quantities, misaligned dates, unsynchronized versions, and missing signatures or receipts.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of cited content, each entry containing the original text snippet and a source identifier, and the length can be 0. "Externally available entry points and authorization scope" is subsequently completed by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Study abroad service contract | The scope of services, fees, and signature dates in the contract must correspond to the authorization scope and the parent-visible scope, and the names and dates must not conflict with the application form | Open the original contract, verify the signature, dates, and authorization clauses item by item, and record field discrepancies |
| School application form | The institution name, major, intake term, and submission receipt in the application form must be consistent with the same record in the contract and personal statement, and the quantities and dates must not be misaligned | Compare the application form with the contract and personal statement, and check whether the name, quantity, date, and receipt are complete |
| Personal statement | The version, word count, and final signed approval of the personal statement must be synchronized with the service rounds agreed in the contract, and unsynchronized versions or missing signatures must not appear | Compare each version of the personal statement with the contract rounds, check the signature and receipt, and record unsynchronized items |
| Cited content array | The number of array entries is consistent with the matched materials; being empty is also normal; quoteMaxToken is the citation content budget, and the number of entries is recorded separately without equality comparison | Access once with a restricted identity, and check the number of citations and source identifiers in responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) and quoteList |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the contract and the application form. Cause: The two materials are filled in separately, without field-level comparison and receipt archiving.
- Symptom: The personal statement version is not synchronized, and the final version is inconsistent with the contract rounds. Cause: The update cadence is not bound to the deadline, and the old version remains within the accessible scope.
- Symptom: During authorized access, content is visible beyond authorization, or citation markers are missing, or snippets do not match the original text. Cause: The visibility scope is not set by identity, and the citation array and original paragraphs are not traced back item by item.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: ask a question with original-text support, and check whether the citation array and markers can trace back to the original text; then ask a question with no matching materials, and confirm that the array is empty while the pipeline runs through.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the settings, and confirm that content beyond authorization is not visible.
- In the node, check the selected knowledge base collections and their vector models, and confirm that they belong to the same vector model.
- Open the search parameter panel and verify the values item by item, and check the number of citations, source identifiers, and the
quoteMaxTokenbudget inquoteListwithinresponseData.