What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on journal three-review three-proof and editorial quality materials, including three types: three-review forms, proofs, and proofreading records. The three-review form carries the fields, dates, and signatures of initial review, re-review, and final review; the proof presents layout and textual change marks; the proofreading record registers the proofreading round, proofreader, date, and receipt. When the three types of materials enter knowledge base retrieval and recall, their roles differ: the three-review form is split and indexed as the process basis, the proof participates in semantic recall as evidence of changes, and the proofreading record participates in full-text recall as a sign-off credential. Materials are updated in batches according to the journal publication cycle, versions iterate as proofreading rounds advance, and fields commonly use names, quantities, dates, and signatures as verification anchors. The retrieval service selects recall channels according to material form, outputs candidate snippets and similarity scores, for subsequent nodes or manual generation of external entry points and authorization scope.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate snippets and similarity scores (after mode, merge, rerank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). The externally available entry points and authorization scope are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Three-review form | Fields, dates, and signatures are complete, and correspond to the names, quantities, and dates in the proof and proofreading record | In the search test, switch searchMode, and check whether the approval dates and proofreading round records in the three-review form candidate snippets are consistent |
| Proof | Layout changes correspond item by item to the proofreading record, and the version number and date are synchronized | Compare the order of the first few candidates before and after enabling usingReRank, and check the change marks in the proof snippets against the proofreading record entries |
| Proofreading record | Proofreading round, proofreader, date, and receipt are complete, with no missing signatures | Search once each with synonymous questions, record the number of candidates and the similarity score, and check whether the receipt fields fall within the candidate snippets |
| Authorization scope object | Visitor identity matches the visible scope, and unauthorized access is not visible | Access once with a restricted identity and see whether the visible scope matches the setting; for the citation limit, check the cited text tokens, record the array count separately, and limit only controls the number of candidates |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name and date of the same three-review form do not match in two places. Cause: versions are not synchronized, and the old three-review form and the new proof are mixed into the same index.
- Phenomenon: The proofreading record lacks a signature or receipt, but candidate snippets are still recalled. Cause: the sign-off fields were not retained during splitting, and full-text recall brings back unsigned paragraphs as well.
- Phenomenon: Changing the wording makes it impossible to recall proof changes. Cause: question optimization does not cover references, semantic and full-text candidates are not merged, and relevant snippets are already lost before reranking.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: test once each with synonymously rewritten questions, compare the number of candidates and the similarity score, then toggle usingReRank to see changes in the ranking of the first few items, and check the number of candidates under searchMode and limit.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the setting, and ensure unauthorized content does not appear in candidates or citations.
- In the search test, switch
searchModefor the three-review form, proof, and proofreading record respectively, record the number of candidates and scores, and check whether names, quantities, dates, and signatures are consistent. - Compare the fields of the same record in the two materials item by item; when version desynchronization or missing signature/receipt is found, return to the material side to complete it before retrieving again.