What this category's data looks like
This page organizes materials for the establishment and annual reports of Chinese-foreign cooperative education institutions. The sources are establishment applications, cooperation agreements, articles of association, and annual report receipts, and the update cadence rolls according to application batches and annual submission nodes. When the materials enter multi-turn dialogue and prompt features, the establishment application serves as the first-round basis for the institution name, education level, and application date; the cooperation agreement provides the comparison basis for the names, quantities, and signing dates of both Chinese and foreign parties; the articles of association constrain the wording of the decision-making body and the scope of authorization; and the annual report receipt is used to check missing signatures and the receipt number. Field characteristics are concentrated in four categories: names, quantities, dates, and signatures. In the same record, inconsistent abbreviated names, non-uniform quantity bases, and misaligned dates often appear across different materials, and unsynchronized versions and missing signatures or receipts are also high-frequency. External entry points and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions; the dialogue side is only responsible for the historical message scope and answer constraints, for parents or superiors to view under a restricted identity.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the referenced historical message scope and answer constraints. "External entry points and authorization scope" are determined by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model only processes filtered materials. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, the preceding text cannot be used; if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Establishment application | The institution name, education level, and application date must be item-by-item consistent with the cooperation agreement and articles of association, and signatures and receipts must not be missing | Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and observe whether the second question inherits the reference from the first question |
| Cooperation agreement | The names, quantities, and signing dates of both Chinese and foreign parties must match the establishment application and articles of association, and versions must be synchronized | Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that run consumption changes with the turns adjustment, and check whether the opening message is treated as preceding text |
| Articles of association | The wording of the decision-making body and authorization scope must be consistent with the establishment application and cooperation agreement, and missing signatures or receipts must be corrected | Initiate one access with a restricted identity, check whether the visible scope matches the setting, and ensure unauthorized content is not visible |
| Annual report receipt | The receipt number, submission date, and signature must be consistent with the corresponding records in the establishment application, cooperation agreement, and articles of association | Check the transfer scope of chatId, messages, and variables in the dialogue, and confirm that historical message references do not exceed the setting |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the establishment application and the cooperation agreement. Cause: The two materials were revised separately and entered dialogue references without cross-comparison.
- Phenomenon: The version of the articles of association is not synchronized, and external answers still cite the old authorization scope. Cause: After the materials were updated, they were not re-entered into the prompt constraints, and the historical message scope continued to use the old content.
- Phenomenon: The annual report receipt is missing a signature or receipt number, but visitors can still see the related fields. Cause: File permissions and the publishing service did not narrow the visible scope according to restricted identity.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question inherits the reference from the first question, and check whether the reference scope of chatId, messages, and variables matches the setting.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the setting, and ensure unauthorized content is not visible.
- Check the current memory turns value in the application settings and match it with the preceding text scope required by the question
- Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that run consumption changes with the turns adjustment