What this category's data looks like
Journal three-review three-proofreading and editorial quality materials usually include three types: three-review forms, proofs, and proofreading records. The three-review form records the fields, dates, and signatures of the initial review, re-review, and final review; the proof carries the layout and textual change traces; the proofreading record registers the responsible person, time, and receipt for each proofreading. The three come from different sources and also update at different rhythms: the three-review form is filled in level by level as the review stages advance, the proof is refreshed with each typesetting round, and the proofreading record accumulates by proofreading round. When the materials enter the authorized access and external service function, each has a different role: the three-review form determines whether the review-stage chain is closed, the proof determines the version presented externally, and the proofreading record determines whether changes are traceable. The field characteristics are concentrated in four items: name, quantity, date, and signature. If any one of them does not match between two materials, it will affect the determination of the visible scope.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the HTTP node in the workflow, outputting the response body, status code, and returned fields. The externally available entry point and authorization scope are determined by subsequent nodes parsing the response, or the external system handles it as agreed to complete the rest.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Three-review form | Whether the review-stage names, dates, and signatures of the initial review, re-review, and final review are complete level by level | Compare the review-stage names and signature fields one by one, and check the chronological order of the dates |
| Proof | Whether the layout version and textual changes are from the same source as the proofreading record | Take the same round of proof and proofreading record, and compare the number of changes and dates |
| Proofreading record | Whether the name, quantity, date, and receipt of each proofreading are consistent | Count the number of records by proofreading round, and check whether receipts and signatures are missing |
| Request URL and path parameters | Whether placeholder variables can be resolved into actual values | View the rendered complete URL in the request preview, and check the source of variables |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the three-review form and the proofreading record. Cause: The two materials are entered separately, without using the same version as the baseline.
- Symptom: The proof has been refreshed, but the proofreading record still remains at the previous round. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the old record was not invalidated or marked.
- Symptom: The three-review form lacks the final review signature, and the proofreading record lacks the receipt. Cause: The signature and receipt steps were not backfilled along with the process.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: preview the rendered request, check the status code and returned fields, then compare the responseData result against one sample.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity, and see whether the visible scope matches the setting.
- In the variables panel, check the source of each placeholder, and confirm that
variables,Authorization, and request body fields are all traceable. - Count the names, quantities, dates, and signatures of the three-review forms, proofs, and proofreading records by review stage and proofreading round, and mark inconsistent items.