What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the graduate admissions re-examination and admission scenario; materials come from re-examination plans, candidate score sheets, transfer lists, and multilingual comparison drafts. The re-examination plan contains program names, re-examination subjects, time and location, and signature fields; the candidate score sheet contains candidate numbers, subject scores, total scores, and dates; the transfer list contains transfer programs, quotas, candidate sources, and receipts. During multilingual materials and terminology processing, the re-examination plan and transfer list enter the knowledge base as retrieval support materials, while the score sheet is used to verify consistency of quantities and dates. The update cadence advances with admissions batches; a new version is released before each round of re-examination, and old versions must be marked with version status. The field characteristic is that for the same record, names, quantities, and dates must be consistent across the plan, score sheet, and transfer list, and signatures or receipts must be complete.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the indexing service and vector database, outputting vectors and index status (whether recall is possible, whether data in the same group is merged). "Unified terminology glossary and comparison draft" is then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work (retrieval and citation trimming only take support materials).
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Re-examination plan | Program names, re-examination subjects, time and location, and signature fields are consistent among the plan, score sheet, and transfer list | Open the re-examination plan and score sheet, and check whether the same program name, re-examination date, and signature fields are complete |
| Candidate score sheet | Candidate numbers, subject scores, total scores, and dates match in quantity and date between the score sheet and transfer list | Extract three candidate records and compare the numbers, total scores, and dates in the score sheet and transfer list |
| Transfer list | Transfer programs, quotas, candidate sources, and receipts are version-synchronized between the list and plan, and receipts are complete | Check the transfer list version number against the plan version number, and inspect whether receipts or signatures are missing |
| Data row index fields | Multiple vector identifiers for one data row are all present, and they match the vector model actually used by the knowledge base | Open a data row and check the index fields, confirm the status is indexed, and review the coverage scope of the rebuild task record |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same candidate's name or total score does not match between the score sheet and transfer list. Inspect the following: the two materials were entered separately, no cross-table consistency check was performed, and versions were not synchronized.
- Symptom: after the re-examination plan is updated, the transfer list still references the old program names and dates. Inspect the following: versions were not synchronized, the old version was not marked invalid.
- Symptom: the transfer list lacks receipts or has blank signature fields, making it untraceable after publication. Inspect the following: receipts were not fully collected during material circulation.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: extract one data row and inspect the index fields to confirm multiple vector identifiers are all present and the status is indexed; then run a retrieval once to see whether data in the same group is merged and the highest score is taken. Check the use of limit in cited text; the number of citations is recorded separately and is not compared for equality with quoteMaxToken.
Business test: extract three terms and check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the document, whether translated names can refer back to the source text, and verify the fields, dates, and signatures of the re-examination plan, candidate score sheet, and transfer list.
- In the knowledge base settings, check that the index model matches the vector model actually used by the knowledge base; after changing models, trigger rebuilds only for data that has already been indexed, and review the data scope covered by the rebuild task record.
- Open a data row and check the index fields to confirm multiple vector identifiers are all present; after retrieval, check whether data in the same group is merged and whether duplicate entries appear.