What this category's data looks like
Graduate training process management covers materials such as training plans, proposal reports, and mid-term assessment forms, sourced from multi-level submissions by supervisors, schools, and graduate schools, with an update cadence that rolls forward with semesters and assessment milestones. In the multilingual materials and terminology processing scenario, the training plan undertakes the first naming of course and research direction terminology, the proposal report carries the multilingual correspondence of topic selection and keywords, and the mid-term assessment form reuses prior terminology and appends phased achievement statements. The three types of materials contain fields including name, quantity, date, and signature column; when entering the workflow, they each play the roles of terminology source, correspondence carrier, and consistency verification sample, and must keep translated names traceable back to the source text within the same terminology table and correspondence draft.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction state records. "Unified terminology table and correspondence draft" is continued and completed by subsequent nodes according to the branch. When the user selection node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow state; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Training plan | Whether the course name, research direction, and date fields are consistent with the proposal report | In the node, check the options and branch connections one by one, reference variables to backfill the terminology name, and run a trial |
| Proposal report | Whether the topic selection keywords, quantity, and signature column match the mid-term assessment form | In subsequent nodes, reference nodeId to locate the branch, and check whether the translated name can be traced back to the source text |
| Mid-term assessment form | Whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent across the two materials | Trigger a user selection once, and view the node status and branch direction in the run record |
| Unified terminology table and correspondence draft | Whether the three terminology entries are written consistently throughout the whole document and whether the versions are synchronized | Sample three terminology entries to check their writing throughout the whole document, and check fields missing signatures or receipts |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the training plan and the proposal report. Cause: The two materials are submitted separately, and the terminology source is not unified with traceability back to the source text.
- Symptom: The mid-term assessment form uses old-version terminology and is not synchronized with the new terminology table version. Cause: When the branch continues execution, the correspondence draft is not refreshed according to the latest option.
- Symptom: The proposal report or mid-term assessment form is missing a signature or receipt, yet the process still moves forward. Cause: After the interaction is completed, the signature column is not checked before entering the next node.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: run trials for each option one by one, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run record, and confirm that variables and nodeId are correctly referenced in subsequent nodes.
Business test: sample three terminology entries to check whether their writing is consistent throughout the whole document, and check that the translated names can be traced back to the source text.
- In the node, check the options and branch connections one by one, and confirm that each option corresponds to one branch.
- Trigger a user selection once, and view the node status and selection result variables in the run record.