What this category's data looks like
This category's data involves three types of materials in graduate training process management: training plans, proposal reports, and mid-term assessment forms. Sources are mentor submissions, college aggregation, and academic affairs archiving, with an update cadence that advances along semester milestones. Training plans contain course names, credits, time arrangements, and mentor signatures; proposal reports contain thesis titles, references, review comments, and dates; mid-term assessment forms contain assessment indicators, scores, conclusions, and signatures. In the multilingual materials and terminology processing scenario, the same term must be consistent throughout and its translated name must be able to refer back to the original text. When the three types of materials enter knowledge base retrieval, they each serve as candidate segment sources, supporting the generation of a unified terminology glossary and a comparison draft.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Object | Judgment | Verification Action |
| Training plan | Whether the course name, credits, date, and signature are consistent in the thesis proposal report and the mid-term assessment form | Search once each using two different expressions of the same term, record the number of candidate entries and scores, and check whether the returned snippets cover the three materials |
| Opening report | Whether the thesis title, references, review date, and mid-term assessment form records match up | Switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, and hybrid, compare the number of candidates and scores, and confirm whether cross-material citations appear simultaneously |
| Mid-term assessment form | Whether assessment indicators, conclusions, signatures, and acknowledgments are complete and version-synchronized | Enable and disable usingReRank, compare the top few rankings, and check whether key segments are retained under the similarity threshold |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same term is written differently in the training plan and the proposal report, and the translated name cannot refer back to the original text. Cause: Terminology is not unified and versions are not synchronized, and retrieval candidates do not cover all materials.
- Symptom: The mid-term assessment form lacks a signature or receipt, and the proposal report date does not match the training plan. Cause: Fields and signatures are not verified during material circulation, and archived versions are inconsistent.
- Symptom: There are many candidate segments but the ones ranked first are irrelevant, and the answer lacks key paragraphs. Cause: The retrieval mode does not match the material form, and reranking and similarity filtering are not tuned.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: Test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle reranking to observe the ranking of the top few results; record the number of candidates and scores, and check the impact of searchMode, usingReRank, similarity, and limit on the results.
Business testing: Sample three terms and check whether their spelling is consistent throughout, verify whether the translated names can refer back to the original text, and confirm that the fields, dates, and signatures of the training plan, proposal report, and mid-term assessment form match up.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch retrieval modes and toggle reranking, record the number of candidates and scores, and check whether the returned segments cover the three types of materials.
- Compare the fields, dates, and signatures of the training plan, proposal report, and mid-term assessment form, mark inconsistencies, and trace back versions and receipts.