Sharing and Embedding for College Admissions Health Examination Organization: Draft Materials and Hand Over Responsibilities

Admissions Health Exams: review sharing & embeds for material handover. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

The materials for college admissions physical examination organization include physical examination forms, re-examination applications, and restricted-major notifications. Their sources are the original records submitted by each middle school and physical examination station, and the update cadence is archived in stages as admissions batches progress. The physical examination form states the past medical history and the conclusions of each examination item; the re-examination application states the reason for application and the re-examination items; the restricted-major notification states the restriction conclusion and the notification date. When the materials enter the sharing and embedding function, the physical examination form, re-examination application, and restricted-major notification serve as drafts to be issued and handover records; the publishing channel generates a sharing link and configures the display items, and external visitors view the corresponding content according to their identity and then complete receipt, so that records with complete fields, clear responsible persons, and consistent versions and dates enter the next stage.

Configuration and implementation checks

This step is executed by the sharing link in the publishing channel (the publishing service performs authentication), and outputs the sharing link, display parameters, and authentication result. The issuable material drafts and handover records are then completed by external visitors viewing the corresponding content according to their identity.

ObjectCheckVerification action
Physical examination formThe fields include past medical history, examination conclusions, physical examination date, and chief examiner signature; the name, quantity, and date must be consistent with the re-examination application and restricted-major notificationCheck whether the name, quantity, and date of the physical examination form are consistent with those of the re-examination application and restricted-major notification, and check whether the version and signature are complete
Re-examination applicationThe fields include reason for application, re-examination items, application date, and applicant signature; the same record name and date must be consistent with the physical examination form and restricted-major notificationCheck whether the same record name and date of the re-examination application are consistent with those of the physical examination form and restricted-major notification, and check whether the version and receipt are complete
Restricted-major notificationThe fields include restriction conclusion, notification date, and notifier signature; the same record name, quantity, and date must be consistent with the physical examination form and re-examination applicationCheck whether the same record name, quantity, and date of the restricted-major notification are consistent with those of the physical examination form and re-examination application, and check whether the signature and receipt are complete
Sharing linkThe expiration time, per-minute access limit, identity verification, and referenced display items are set according to usage needsCheck the values of the expiration time and access limit, access once with an unauthenticated session, and check the referenced display switches item by item

Three common errors

  • Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the physical examination form and the re-examination application. Cause: The two drafts were drafted by different stages and were not backfilled and checked against the same record.
  • Symptom: The version of the restricted-major notification was not synchronized, and the receiving party saw an old conclusion. Cause: After the material was updated, the sharing link was not regenerated or the version and date were not synchronized.
  • Symptom: The handover record lacks a signature or receipt, and the next stage cannot complete receipt. Cause: The responsible person did not sign the draft and handover record, and the receiving party did not return the receipt.

How to verify the setup

Acceptance of this function: access once each with an unauthenticated session and an over-limit request, and check the allowance and referenced display. Check the expiration time, per-minute access limit, and identity verification callback corresponding to shareId, check the switches for referenced snippet, referenced full text, and source original text download item by item, and record the number of references and the tokens of the referenced text; do not compare the two for equality.

Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.

  • Check the values of the expiration time and per-minute access limit corresponding to shareId, and try once with an over-limit request.
  • Access once with an unauthenticated session, and check the switch states of referenced snippet, referenced full text, and source original text download item by item.