What this category's data looks like
Vocational college program setup filing materials typically include the program setup filing form, talent demand justification, and faculty and equipment lists. Fields involve program name, code, program length, enrollment scale, justification date, equipment quantity, signatures, and receipts. These materials are updated according to the annual declaration and correction rhythm, and the names, quantities, and dates of the same program across different materials need to be aligned item by item. When entering knowledge base retrieval and recall, the filing form is the main record carrier, the justification materials provide the demand basis, the faculty and equipment lists supplement the condition data, and multilingual materials and terminology handling require that the same term be consistent throughout the entire text and that translated names can refer back to the original text. The three types of materials each play different roles: the filing form locates program entries, the justification and lists are used for cross-checking fields, and the terminology table and comparison draft are used to unify translated names and wording.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate snippets and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, rerank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). "Unified terminology table and comparison draft" is completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Program setup filing form | Whether the fields, dates, and signatures are consistent with the justification materials | In the search test, switch searchMode and check the candidate snippets for program name, code, date, and signature receipt |
| Talent demand justification | Whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record can be aligned with the filing form | Compare semantic and full-text candidates, and check whether the justification date and program name refer back to the original text of the filing form |
| Faculty and equipment list | Whether the equipment quantity and faculty fields are consistent with the filing form records | Compare the first few candidates before and after enabling rerank, and check whether the quantities and names come from the same source |
| Unified terminology table and comparison draft | Whether the same term is written consistently throughout the entire text and the translated name can refer back to the original text | Use similarity and limit to observe the number of candidate entries and scores, and sample three terms to check their wording throughout the entire text |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name and date of the same program do not match between the filing form and the justification materials. Cause: Multiple material versions are not synchronized, and retrieval candidates are not merged and checked according to the same record.
- Phenomenon: The equipment quantity is inconsistent between the list and the filing form, and signatures or receipts are missing. Cause: Correction materials are not backfilled, and candidate snippets do not cover the signature page and receipt page.
- Phenomenon: The same term has different translated names in different materials and cannot refer back to the original text. Cause: The terminology table is not unified, and retrieval recall snippets only cover partial paragraphs.
How to verify the setup
This function acceptance: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare the number of candidate entries and scores, then toggle rerank on and off to observe the ordering of the first few entries; check the effects of searchMode, similarity, limit, and usingReRank.
Business test: sample three terms to check whether their wording is consistent throughout the entire text, confirm that translated names can refer back to the original text, and check the names, quantities, and dates in the filing form, justification, and list.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchModeand compare the candidate snippets and scores of the semantic, full-text, and hybrid modes. - Enable and disable rerank, compare the order of the first few candidates; record the tokens and array length of the cited text, and check
similarityandlimitrespectively.