What this category's data looks like
This page addresses modern apprenticeship and order class management. Material sources include school-enterprise cooperation agreements, order class training plans, and master-apprentice mentoring records. Cooperation agreements provide the cooperating entities, term, and signature/seal information; training plans give the courses, positions, and assessment arrangements; mentoring records carry the master, apprentice, date, and signature. The update cadence advances with semesters and batches: agreements are revised by cohort, plans are adjusted by semester, and records are supplemented weekly or per session. Field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts. When the three types of materials enter workflow orchestration, each serves as an independent input source; after being routed through the user selection node, subsequent nodes continue processing by branch, forming a unified terminology glossary and comparison draft.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction status records. The "unified terminology glossary and comparison draft" is completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution along the branch. When the user selection node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow status; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the chosen option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| School-enterprise cooperation agreement | Whether the names, quantities, dates, and signatures are consistent with the order class training plan | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and reference variables and nodeId in subsequent nodes for a trial run |
| Order class training plan | Whether the version is synchronized, and whether course and position names can be traced back to the original agreement text | Trigger the user selection node once, and inspect the node status and branch direction in the run record |
| Master-apprentice mentoring record | Whether the names, quantities, and dates of the same record mismatch between the two materials, and whether signatures or receipts are missing | Reference the selection result variable in subsequent nodes and run a trial, checking the passing of variables and nodeId |
| Unified terminology glossary and comparison draft | Whether the same term is written consistently throughout, and whether the translated name can be traced back to the original text | Sample three terms to check their spelling throughout, verify the tokens of the referenced text, and record the array count separately |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record mismatch between the agreement and the plan. Cause: The two materials were entered separately, without field-level comparison.
- Symptom: The training plan version is not synchronized, and old-version fields are still referenced. Cause: After revision, the corresponding input was not updated on the node branch.
- Symptom: The mentoring record lacks a signature or receipt, yet the process continues. Cause: After the interaction is completed, the node status and branch direction were not checked.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Run a trial for each option, check the branch direction and interaction status in the run record, and confirm that the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes.
Business test: Sample three terms to check whether their spelling is consistent throughout, and verify whether the translated names can be traced back to the original text.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and confirm that each option corresponds to one branch.
- Reference the selection result variable in subsequent nodes and run a trial once, checking the passing of
variablesandnodeId.