What this category's data looks like
This category's data looks like this: Modern apprenticeship and order class management involves multilingual materials such as school-enterprise cooperation agreements, order class training plans, and mentor apprenticeship records. Sources include three parties: the school, the enterprise, and the mentor, and the update cadence changes with semesters, batches, and agreement cycles. Field characteristics include training positions, mentoring mentors, cycles, assessment conclusions, signatures, and receipts, and dates and quantities appear repeatedly across materials from multiple parties. After materials enter document parsing and chunking, their roles differ: agreements provide rights, responsibilities, and terms; training plans provide course and position arrangements; apprenticeship records provide process and results. All are first stored as visible data rows and bound to a unique data identifier for subsequent retrieval and terminology comparison.
Configuration and implementation checks
Configuration and implementation checks: This step is executed by parsing and training tasks (server-side tasks), outputting data rows and index status (parsed, indexing, indexed). The "unified terminology table and comparison draft" is then completed by retrieval and subsequent processing.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| School-enterprise cooperation agreement | The name, quantity, date, and signature receipt must match the training plan and apprenticeship records | Check the agreement fields item by item against the other two materials, confirm that signatures and receipts are complete, and check whether the data row status is parsed / indexing / indexed |
| Order class training plan | The same term is written consistently throughout, and the translated name can refer back to the original text | Sample three terms and check their writing throughout, verify the impact of chunkSize and chunkSplitter on chunk boundaries, and record the number of array entries and reference text tokens |
| Mentor apprenticeship record | The name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent in the two materials, and the version is synchronized | Check the file records and data rows separately, confirm that trainingType corresponds to the processing mode, and check that the rebuild task only covers data rows with completed indexing |
| Data rows and index status | It is in one of the three states and consistent with the interface display, and data pending indexing does not participate in recall | Open the data row to check the status transitions, and confirm that changing the model only rebuilds data with completed indexing |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same apprenticeship record do not match between the agreement and the training plan. Cause: Multilingual materials are maintained separately, and terminology and field comparison have not been done.
- Symptom: Newly uploaded materials cannot be found. Cause: The data row is in a pending-indexing state, and the retrieval layer naturally isolates it from recall.
- Symptom: After training fails, empty data rows remain, or signatures and receipts are missing. Cause: Training interruption leaves orphan data, and material versions are not synchronized.
How to verify the setup
How to verify the setup: Acceptance for this feature: upload one material and observe the data row status transitions and the coverage scope of the rebuild task; confirm that parsed chunks are immediately stored as visible data rows after parsing completes and bound to a unique data identifier, that indexing transitions through the three states parsed / indexing / indexed, and that changing the model only rebuilds data with completed indexing.
Business test: sample three terms and check whether their writing is consistent throughout
- Check the file records and data rows separately, confirm that the identifiers of files and data rows are distinguishable, and record the values of
chunkSize,chunkSplitter, andtrainingType. - Check the data rows covered by the rebuild task, and confirm that it only covers data with completed indexing, and that data pending indexing does not participate in the rebuild chain.