What this category's data looks like
Vocational training subsidy application materials include three types: training class filing records, sign-in records, and completion assessment forms. The training class filing fields include class name, training occupation, start and end dates, number of trainees, and handler's signature; the sign-in record fields include date, trainee name, sign-in handwriting, and lead instructor's signature; the completion assessment form fields include assessment date, score, assessor's signature, and institution receipt. The materials are organized by the applying institution by class and updated in batches at the class start and completion milestones; multiple materials for the same class must keep names, quantities, and dates consistent. When entering workflow orchestration, the three types of materials serve respectively as the terminology extraction source, the cross-checking draft, and the original-text basis for back-reference, and are advanced by nodes according to the user's selected branch.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting the branch direction and interaction state records. The "unified terminology glossary and comparison draft" is completed next by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. After triggering, the conversation enters the interaction state and records the workflow state; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Training class filing records | Class name, training occupation, start and end dates, number of trainees, and handler's signature are consistent across all materials | Check field by field against the sign-in records and completion assessment forms; when dates and numbers do not match, back-reference the original text; record referenced variables with variables |
| Sign-in records | Date, trainee name, sign-in handwriting, and lead instructor's signature correspond to the training class filing records | Check sign-in dates and numbers day by day by class; mark missing signatures or receipts; reference nodeId in subsequent nodes to locate the source |
| Completion assessment forms | Assessment date, score, assessor's signature, and institution receipt correspond to the training class filing records and sign-in records | Check the assessment date and number of completions; when versions are not synchronized, the latest receipt prevails; reference variables to back-reference the original text |
| Unified terminology glossary and comparison draft | The same term is consistent throughout the entire text, and the translated name can be back-referenced to the original text | Extract three terms and check whether their usage is consistent throughout the entire text, and compare the comparison draft with the original text item by item |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the training class filing records and the sign-in records. Cause: The two materials were organized in batches, and the fields were not checked uniformly by class.
- Symptom: The completion assessment form and the training class filing records are not synchronized in version, and the old receipt is still referenced. Cause: After the materials were updated, the terminology and comparison draft were not re-extracted by class.
- Symptom: The sign-in records lack the lead instructor's signature or the completion assessment form lacks the institution receipt. Cause: The signature and receipt fields were not checked item by item during organization.
How to verify the setup
This feature acceptance: Try running each option one by one, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run records, confirm that the options correspond to the branch connections, and that the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes.
Business test: Extract three terms and check whether their usage is consistent throughout the entire text, compare the comparison draft with the original text item by item, and confirm that the translated name can be back-referenced to the original text.
- In the nodes, check the options and branch connections one by one, and run once to view the node status in the run records.
- Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and run once to confirm that the process continues execution according to the corresponding option.