What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the continuing education credit recognition scenario, handling three types of materials: course filing forms, study certificates, and credit recognition forms. Course filing forms come from the filing step of the educational institution and contain the course name, credit hours, filing date, and handler signature; study certificates are issued by the teaching site after the learner completes study and contain the name, course name, credit hours, completion date, and seal; credit recognition forms come from the recognition institution's summary and contain recognized credit hours, recognition date, and review signature. The three types of materials update at different rhythms: filing forms change with course offerings, study certificates are generated by batch, and recognition forms are summarized by application cycle. In terms of field characteristics, the four places most prone to cross-material discrepancies are course name, credit hours, date, and signature. After materials enter the workflow, the filing form serves as the baseline source, the study certificate as the item-by-item comparison source, and the recognition form as the summary output source; multilingual materials and terminology handling must keep translated names traceable back to the original text during orchestration.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the workflow node (user selection and branching), outputting branch direction and interaction state records. "Unified terminology glossary and comparison draft" is then completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. When the node is triggered, the conversation enters the interaction state and records the workflow state; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the chosen option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Course filing form | Whether the course name and credit hours correspond item by item with the study certificate and credit recognition form, and whether the date and signature are complete | Compare the course name, credit hours, filing date, and handler signature across the three materials item by item, and record discrepancy entries |
| Study certificate | Whether the name, course name, credit hours, and completion date are consistent with the filing form, and whether the seal or receipt is missing | Extract records by batch, check the course name and credit hour wording, and check whether the seal and receipt are complete |
| Credit recognition form | Whether the recognized credit hours and recognition date match the filing form and study certificate, and whether the review signature is complete | Before summarizing, trace each item back to the filing form and study certificate, and mark inconsistent quantities, dates, and missing signature items |
| User selection node | Whether each option corresponds to one branch, whether the interaction state is recorded, and whether the selection result variable is passed to subsequent nodes | In the node, check the options and branch connections one by one, trigger once to view the node state in the run record, reference variables in subsequent nodes and do a trial run, and check the nodeId target |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same course has different name wording in the filing form and the study certificate, and the credit hours do not match either. Cause: Multilingual materials have not unified terminology, each material is filled in according to its own template, and a cross-material comparison step is missing.
- Symptom: The credit recognition form has been updated, but the study certificate still uses the old course name and date. Cause: Versions are not synchronized, materials generated by batch are not traced back to the filing form baseline, and update rhythms are inconsistent.
- Symptom: The recognition form lacks a review signature, and the study certificate lacks a seal or receipt. Cause: The signature and receipt steps are not included in orchestration verification, and completeness is not checked item by item when materials are summarized.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Run a trial for each option, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run record, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, that the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes, and that the variables and nodeId references point correctly.
Business test: Sample three terms and check whether their wording is consistent throughout the entire text, and trace them back to the original text to verify the translated names, confirming that the same term is written consistently in the course filing form, study certificate, and credit recognition form.
- In the user selection node, check the options and branch connections one by one, trigger once, and then view the node state and branch direction in the run record.
- Reference the selection result variable in subsequent nodes and do a trial run, check
variablesandnodeId, and confirm that the process continues execution after the interaction is completed.