What this category's data looks like
Continuing education credit recognition materials mainly consist of course filing forms, study certificates, and credit recognition forms. Their sources are the routine archives of training institutions and competent authorities, and their update cadence follows training batches and the annual recognition cycle. In terms of field characteristics, the three materials share elements such as personnel name, course name, credit hours, start and end dates, signatures, and receipts, but each plays a different role: the course filing form is used to record the course and credit hour basis in advance, the study certificate is used to confirm an individual's completion status, and the credit recognition form is used to summarize the recognition conclusion. When multilingual materials enter this function, the fields are first split according to material role, and then a unified terminology table and comparison draft are established, so that the same term keeps the same wording across the three types of materials—filing, certificate, and recognition—and the translated name can point back to the original text, making it easy to check item by item when publishing externally.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, which outputs the model binding relationships and channel responses. The unified terminology table and comparison draft are then completed by dialogue and retrieval using that model. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different stages bind different model types, and the type labels need to be checked in the model configuration.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Course filing form | Fields include course name, credit hours, start and end dates, signatures, and receipts; the name and dates must correspond item by item with the study certificate and credit recognition form | Compare the course name, credit hours, dates, and signature fields across the three materials, and check the model identifier returned by the channel |
| Study certificate | The name, quantity, and dates of the same record in the filing form and recognition form must be consistent, and the versions must be synchronized; missing signatures or receipts means it is incomplete | Spot-check how three terms are written in the certificate and recognition form, and check the configuration items maxContext and maxTokens |
| Credit recognition form | The recognition conclusion must be able to point back to the original text of the filing form and study certificate; terminology must be consistent throughout, and dates and quantities must not conflict with the source materials | Check whether the terminology wording in the recognition form is consistent with the source materials, and check the configuration items quoteMaxToken and toolChoice |
| Model configuration | The model type corresponds to the stage in which it is to be used, the channel and key are consistent with the connected service, and the model identifier is consistent with the name listed in the documentation | Check the type labels in the model configuration, and compare the model name returned by the channel with the key source |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The course name, credit hours, and dates of the same record do not match between the course filing form and the study certificate. Cause: The field mapping for multilingual materials is not unified, and the terminology table does not cover that record.
- Symptom: The version referenced by the credit recognition form is not synchronized with the filing form and study certificate, and signatures or receipts are missing. Cause: The material update cadence is inconsistent, the versions are not synchronized, and the signature fields are not checked.
- Symptom: Retrieval reports an indexing model-related error, or the answer style changes abruptly after switching models. Cause: The model type does not match the stage binding, and the model identifier is inconsistent with the model name returned by the channel.
How to verify the setup
Function acceptance: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, and check the configuration items maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice.
Business test: sample three terms to check whether their wording is consistent throughout, and check whether the translated names can point back to the original text.
- In the model configuration, check whether the model type labels correspond to the stage to be used, and compare the model name returned by the channel with the key source.
- Compare the fields, dates, and signatures of the course filing form, study certificate, and credit recognition form, and check whether the name, quantity, and dates of the same record are consistent.