What this category's data looks like
In the scenario of course scheduling and course consumption in training institutions, three types of materials—timetables, course consumption records, and course change requests—enter the multilingual materials and terminology handling process simultaneously. Timetables carry fields for cycle, class, teacher, and classroom; course consumption records carry actually consumed class hours, dates, and signatures; course change requests carry the original session, target session, approval, and receipt. The material sources are academic affairs system exports and scanned offline forms, with an update rhythm rolling by weekly sessions, and versions synchronized with course change approvals. When entering this feature, the timetable serves as the master data providing session identifiers, course consumption records serve as consumption evidence providing quantities and dates, and course change requests serve as change evidence providing differences and signature information. The three have different roles but must maintain consistent translated names in a unified terminology glossary and comparison draft, and be able to refer back to the original text.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the historical message range and answer constraints for reference. The "unified terminology glossary and comparison draft" is then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, prior context cannot be used; if too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Timetable | Session names, dates, and teacher fields are consistent throughout the multilingual comparison draft | Check the memory turns value in the application settings, use chatId to mark the same session, and sample three terms to check their wording throughout |
| Course consumption record | Consumed class hour quantities and dates in the comparison draft can be traced back to the original text | Use messages to check the historical message range, and sample three terms to check whether their wording is consistent throughout |
| Course change request | The names, dates, and signature receipts of the original session and target session match | Use variables to record course change differences, and sample three terms to check whether their wording is consistent throughout |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same session has mismatched names or dates in the timetable and course consumption record. Cause: The versions of the two materials are not synchronized, and the terminology glossary does not cover aliases for that session.
- Phenomenon: The course change request lacks a signature or receipt, and the course consumption record still consumes according to the original session. Cause: The change evidence did not enter the comparison draft along with the approval flow.
- Phenomenon: In the second question, when using references, the answer does not address the question, and responses become slower with increased consumption. Cause: The memory turns value is too large, bringing in irrelevant prior context, and the opening message is treated as prior context.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question inherits the references from the first question, and check the wording of chatId, messages, and variables within the historical message range.
Business test: Sample three terms to check whether their wording is consistent throughout.
- Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, and match it with the prior context range required by the question.
- Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm the change in runtime consumption after adjusting the turns.