What this category's data looks like
Sino-Foreign cooperative education institution establishment and annual reports involve three types of materials: the establishment application, the cooperation agreement, and the articles of association. The sources are the cooperating parties and the educational institution, and the update cadence advances with the approval and annual report cycles. The establishment application contains fields such as institution name, educational level, program offerings, enrollment scale, person in charge, and signature date; the cooperation agreement contains the cooperating party name, contribution method, amount, term, signing date, and seals; the articles of association contain the governance structure, rules of procedure, financial arrangements, revision records, and receipts. When the three materials enter this feature, the establishment application provides the institution's basic information and field baseline, the cooperation agreement provides the cooperating party name, amount, and date baseline, and the articles of association provide the governance and revision version baseline. After multilingual materials and terminology processing, a unified terminology glossary and a comparison draft are formed for external release.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The unified terminology glossary and comparison draft are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different steps bind different model types, and the type labels and the model names returned by the channel need to be checked in the model configuration.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Establishment application | Institution name, educational level, program offerings, enrollment scale, person in charge, and signature date need to be aligned item by item with the cooperation agreement and the articles of association | In the model configuration, check the language model and indexing model bindings, confirm the maxContext and maxTokens settings, and compare against the model names returned by the channel |
| Cooperation agreement | Cooperating party name, contribution method, amount, term, signing date, and seals need to be consistent with the establishment application and the articles of association | Check the channel configuration and key source, confirm the indexing model is used for text block indexing, and inspect the parameters related to toolChoice |
| Articles of association | Governance structure, rules of procedure, financial arrangements, revision records, and receipts need to be synchronized with the establishment application and the cooperation agreement | Check the reranking model binding and channel response, confirm the quoted content budget quoteMaxToken, and separately record the number of entries in the quoted array |
| Unified terminology glossary and comparison draft | The same term is written consistently throughout the entire text, the translated name can refer back to the source text, and three terms are sampled to check whether the writing is consistent throughout the entire text | Run one conversation and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, and confirm the terminology glossary and comparison draft are completed through conversation and retrieval |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: the same institution name is written differently in the establishment application and the cooperation agreement. Cause: the versions of the two materials are not synchronized, and the terminology glossary is not unified.
- Phenomenon: the enrollment number or signing date does not match between the two materials. Cause: the field sources are not aligned, and the update cadence is inconsistent.
- Phenomenon: the articles of association lack a signature or receipt, blocking external release. Cause: the signing step is not closed-loop, and the materials do not refer back to the source text.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: run one conversation and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, and confirm the model name returned by the channel is consistent with the name listed in the documentation.
Business test: sample three terms to check whether the writing is consistent throughout the entire text, and confirm the translated name can refer back to the source text.
- In the model configuration, check that the model type labels correspond to the steps to be used, and confirm the binding relationships for language, indexing, reranking, etc.
- Check the channel configuration and key source, and confirm the channel key only affects whether the call succeeds and does not determine whether personnel can read knowledge base materials.