What this category's data looks like
This category's data covers the establishment application, cooperation agreement, articles of association, and annual reports of Chinese-foreign cooperative education institutions, with Chinese-English bilingual or multilingual versions coexisting. Material sources include the original texts submitted by both cooperating parties, translated drafts, and successive revisions, with the update cadence advancing along with application batches and annual reporting cycles. Field characteristics center on institution name, education level, program offerings, enrollment scale, signing date, and stamped receipt. When materials enter the knowledge base retrieval and recall function, the establishment application provides the educational positioning and the basis of the agreement, the cooperation agreement carries the rights, obligations, and term of both parties, the articles of association stipulate the governance structure and operating rules, and the annual report reflects implementation status. Multilingual materials use the terminology list as an anchor; retrieval must simultaneously match the original text and the translated name, ensuring the same term is consistent throughout the entire document and that the translated name can refer back to the original text, providing candidate fragments for the subsequent generation of a unified terminology list and a bilingual comparison draft.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate fragments and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, re-rank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). The "unified terminology list and bilingual comparison draft" is completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Establishment application | Institution name, education level, programs, and dates must be aligned item by item with the cooperation agreement and articles of association, with signatures and receipts complete | In the search test, switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, or hybrid, verify whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent across the three materials, and record the number of candidates and scores |
| Cooperation agreement | Partner names, term, quantity, and signing date must be mutually referable with the articles of association and annual report | Retrieve agreement clauses using synonymous questions, enable usingReRank to compare the ranking of the top few results, check whether the translated name can refer back to the original text, and verify the signature page and receipt |
| Articles of association | Governance structure, deliberation rules, and effective date must be synchronized with the application and agreement versions | Filter low-scoring candidates by similarity, verify the articles of association version number and signing date, confirm consistency with the latest agreement, and record the tokens of the cited text |
| Annual report | Annual data, institution name, and submission date must connect with the establishment materials and the previous year's report | Retrieve annual report fields, verify whether the quantity and date of the same indicator match between the agreement and the annual report, check whether signatures or receipts are missing, and record the array count separately |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same institution name is written differently in the application and the agreement. Cause: multilingual versions are not unified, the terminology list is not updated in sync, and retrieval candidates are scattered.
- Symptom: enrollment quantity or signing date does not match between two materials. Cause: revisions were not backfilled, versions are not synchronized, and old drafts remain in the knowledge base.
- Symptom: the articles of association or agreement lacks signatures and receipts. Cause: scanned copies are incomplete, attachments were not ingested into the knowledge base together with the main text, and retrieval only hits the main text.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: test once each with synonymously rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle re-ranking on and off to observe the ranking of the top few results; switch searchMode and usingReRank, observe the filtering effect by similarity, and record the number of candidates and scores.
Business test: sample three terms to check whether their usage is consistent throughout the entire document, confirm that translated names can refer back to the original text, and verify the fields, dates, and signatures of the establishment application, cooperation agreement, and articles of association.
- In the knowledge base search test, retrieve the same term using the original text and the translated name respectively, record the number of candidates and scores, and verify whether the returned fragments cover the three materials.
- Observe the ranking of the top few results once before and once after enabling re-ranking, check the tokens and array count of the cited text after similarity filtering, and confirm that key passages have not been trimmed out.