What this category's data looks like
University admissions physical examination organizations circulate among three types of materials: physical examination forms, re-examination applications, and restricted major notifications, involving multilingual translated names, fields, dates, and signatures. Physical examination forms carry basic items and conclusions; re-examination applications add items and receipts; restricted major notifications cite conclusions and attach major restriction explanations. Materials are updated by batch and year. The same record often appears in two materials with inconsistent names, quantities, and dates, versions not synchronized, and missing signatures or receipts. When entering the knowledge base retrieval and recall function, the three types of materials each serve as candidate fragment sources, while the terminology glossary and comparison drafts serve as consistency benchmarks participating in recall, for subsequent nodes or manual comparison and publication.
Configuration and implementation checks
This stage is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate fragments and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, rerank, filter, and limit trimming). The unified terminology glossary and comparison drafts are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Physical examination form | Fields, dates, and signatures must align item by item with the re-examination application and restricted major notification | In the search test, switch searchMode among semantic, full-text, and hybrid, record the number of candidates and scores, and verify the physical examination form fields and signature receipts |
| Re-examination application | Added items, dates, and receipts must be traceable back to the original text of the physical examination form | Enable and disable usingReRank to compare the ordering of the top few results, and verify whether the names, quantities, and dates in the re-examination application and physical examination form are consistent |
| Restricted major notification | Cited conclusions and major restriction explanations must be synchronized with the versions of the physical examination form and re-examination application | Adjust similarity to observe candidate changes, verify the number of citations and cited text tokens in the restricted major notification, and record the number of items separately |
| Unified terminology glossary and comparison drafts | The same term must be consistent throughout, and translated names must be traceable back to the original text | Sample three terms to check their usage throughout, and verify whether candidate fragments cover the corresponding positions in each material |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record in the physical examination form and re-examination application do not match. Cause: Multilingual translated names are not unified, and field mappings are not checked item by item.
- Phenomenon: The conclusions cited in the restricted major notification are not synchronized with the version of the physical examination form. Cause: Materials are updated by batch, and old versions are not replaced or marked with version numbers.
- Phenomenon: The re-examination application lacks signatures or receipts, and external publication is returned. Cause: Signature and receipt fields are not included in the scope of retrieval candidate verification.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: Test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle rerank to see the ordering of the top few results; switch searchMode, adjust similarity and limit, and record the number of candidates and scores.
Business test: Sample three terms to check whether their usage is consistent throughout, and verify whether translated names can be traced back to the original text.
- In the knowledge base search test, retrieve the same term using semantic, full-text, and hybrid modes respectively, record the number of candidates and scores, and verify whether results from multiple paths are included simultaneously.
- Enable and disable rerank, compare the order of the top few results; adjust similarity and citation limit, verify cited text tokens, and record the number of array items separately.