What this category's data looks like
This category's data covers three types of materials: examination records, course qualification certificates, and graduation application forms. Examination records contain the candidate's basic information, examination registration number, course qualification records, and exemption and transfer annotations; course qualification certificates contain the course code, qualification date, score, and seal; graduation application forms contain the major name, number of courses, total credits, signature, and receipt. During multilingual materials and terminology processing, the three types of materials enter the same terminology base: examination records provide the original course names and dates, course qualification certificates provide the qualification status and seal, and graduation application forms provide the graduation conclusion and signature. The update cadence changes with examination periods and review batches, and the field characteristic is that the same record appears repeatedly across multiple materials; translated names must be able to refer back to the source text, and the terminology table must be consistent throughout.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, which outputs the model binding relationships and channel responses. The "unified terminology table and comparison draft" is then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five types: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition, and different steps bind different model types.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Examination records | The course names, course codes, qualification dates, and exemption annotations are consistent in the terminology table with those in the course qualification certificates and graduation application forms, and the translated names can refer back to the source text | Check the type annotations in the model configuration, confirm that the indexing model and the reranking model are bound to the retrieval step, compare the model names returned by the channel, and check whether maxContext and maxTokens cover the length of the record text |
| Course qualification certificates | The course codes, qualification dates, scores, and seals are consistent in the terminology table with those in the examination records and graduation application forms; when the name, quantity, or date of the same record does not match, the original sealed document prevails | Check the channel configuration and key source, confirm that the language model is bound to the dialogue step, check whether quoteMaxToken covers the quoted content of the qualification certificate, and record the number of array entries separately |
| Graduation application forms | The major name, number of courses, total credits, signature, and receipt are consistent in the terminology table with those in the examination records and course qualification certificates; when the signature or receipt is missing, mark it as pending supplementation | Check the channel configuration and key source, confirm that the language model and the indexing model are bound to the dialogue and retrieval steps respectively, and check whether toolChoice is limited to terminology queries and comparison draft generation |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name, quantity, or date of the same course does not match between the examination records and the graduation application form. Cause: the versions of the two materials are not synchronized, and the terminology table does not refer back based on the original sealed document.
- Symptom: the course qualification certificate lacks a signature or receipt, and the number of courses and total credits in the graduation application form are inconsistent with the examination records. Cause: the signature and receipt were not checked during the material circulation step, and the terminology table did not mark the pending supplementation status.
- Symptom: retrieval reports an indexing model-related error, and the answer style changes abruptly after switching models. Cause: the binding relationship between the indexing model and the language model was not checked by step, and the model names returned by the channel are inconsistent with the names listed in the documentation.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifiers in the responses, confirm that the language model and the indexing model are bound to the dialogue and retrieval steps respectively, and check that the values of maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice are consistent with the channel responses.
Business test: sample three terms and check whether their usage is consistent throughout the document, and confirm that the same term has consistent translated names across the examination records, course qualification certificates, and graduation application forms and can refer back to the source text.
- Check the channel configuration and key source, confirm that the model identifiers are consistent with the names listed in the documentation, and confirm that the model types correspond to the steps in which they are to be used.
- Check the fields, dates, and signatures of the examination records, course qualification certificates, and graduation application forms, mark records missing a signature or receipt, and confirm that the terminology table is consistent throughout.