What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the National Key R&D Program project application scenario. Materials include the project application form, budget application form, and cooperation agreement. Languages cover Chinese, English, and multilingual attachments. Sources are export drafts from the application system and offline countersigned drafts, with updates rolling along with application milestones. The project application form carries research objectives, task breakdown, and assessment indicators; the budget application form carries funding categories, calculation basis, and amounts; the cooperation agreement carries partner names, division of labor, and signatures/seals. When these three materials enter multilingual materials and terminology processing, the project application form provides the first occurrence positions and definitions of terms, the budget application form provides category names and units of measurement, and the cooperation agreement provides institutional translated names and responsibility statements. Field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts, and the same record must be traceable back to the original text across the three materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in application settings, outputting the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The model then completes the unified terminology glossary and comparison draft. The external publishing entry point and file authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions; this configuration does not generate access entry points and does not perform identity or file authentication.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Project application form | Names, quantities, dates, and signatures must correspond item by item with the budget application form and cooperation agreement | Check the memory turns value in application settings, export the terminology glossary, and compare the three materials item by item |
| Budget application form | Funding category names, units of measurement, and dates must be consistent with the project application form | Run a trial with two consecutive rounds of questions and check whether the second round can carry forward the references from the first round |
| Cooperation agreement | Partner names, division-of-labor statements, signatures, and receipts must be consistent with the application materials | Check the historical message range corresponding to chatId and confirm that the referenced content is synchronized with the current version |
| Terminology glossary and comparison draft | The same term must be written consistently throughout, and the translated name must be traceable back to the original text | Sample three terms and check their writing throughout, and record the correspondence between messages and variables |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same record's names and quantities do not match between the project application form and the budget application form. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, and the terminology glossary is not updated in sync.
- Phenomenon: The cooperation agreement version is not synchronized, and signatures or receipts are missing. Cause: The offline countersigned draft was not returned, and the online draft is still the old version.
- Phenomenon: When the second question uses references, the answer does not address the question, responses become slower, and consumption rises. Cause: The memory turns are too large and bring in irrelevant content, and the opening message is treated as prior context.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question carries forward the references from the first question, and check the memory turns value in application settings.
Business test: Sample three terms and check whether their writing is consistent throughout, and confirm that the translated names can be traced back to the original text.
- Check the memory turns in application settings so that the reference range matches the prior context range required by the question.
- Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that consumption changes after adjusting the turns are traceable.