What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of university laboratory safety grading and classification. The materials come from three types: laboratory grading and classification tables, hazard source lists, and safety responsibility statements. The grading and classification table records, item by item for each laboratory, the category, level, and hazard source number; the hazard source list lists names, quantities, storage locations, and update dates; the safety responsibility statement contains the responsible person, signature, and receipt. The three have different update rhythms: the grading and classification table adjusts with assessments, the hazard source list changes with procurement and disposal, and the responsibility statement is re-signed by academic year or personnel change. When the materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt function, the grading and classification table and the hazard source list serve as terminology sources and comparison drafts, and the responsibility statement serves as the basis for checking signatures and receipts; based on this, the model produces a unified terminology table and comparison draft for comparison before external release.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and the output references the historical message range and answer constraints. The "unified terminology table and comparison draft" is then completed by the model. The memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering; if the value is too small, the preceding text cannot be used, and if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Laboratory grading and classification table | The same laboratory name and level are written consistently throughout the whole text, and the hazard source number can be traced back to the list | Check the memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and check whether the reference in the second question inherits from the first question |
| Hazard source list | Names, quantities, storage locations, and update dates match between the two materials | Compare the list and the grading and classification table side by side, and record inconsistencies in names, quantities, and dates |
| Safety responsibility statement | The responsible person, signature, and receipt are complete, and the version is synchronized with the current academic year | Check signatures and receipts one by one, and mark records with missing signatures or unsynchronized versions |
| Continuous follow-up | The second turn can correctly inherit the reference from the first turn | Use messages to construct two turns of questions, and check whether chatId and variables bring in the correct context |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same laboratory has different name spellings in the grading and classification table and the hazard source list. Cause: The two places were entered separately, without being constrained by a unified terminology table.
- Phenomenon: The hazard source quantity or update date does not match between the two materials. Cause: After the list was revised, the grading and classification table was not synchronized, and the versions were not synchronized.
- Phenomenon: The responsibility statement lacks a signature or receipt. Cause: After a personnel change, it was not re-signed, and the old version is still cited as valid material.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this function: two consecutive follow-up questions, to see whether the second question inherits the reference from the first question.
Business test: sample three terms to check whether their spellings are consistent throughout the whole text, and check whether the translated names can be traced back to the source text.
- Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, and match it with the preceding text range required by the question.
- Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that the run consumption changes accordingly after the turns are adjusted.