What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of journal three-stage review and three-proofreading and editorial quality. The materials come from three-stage review forms, proofs, proofreading records, and multilingual materials and terminology comparison drafts. The three-stage review form carries the fields, dates, and signatures of the initial review, re-review, and final review; the proof carries the current state of layout, text, and translated names; the proofreading record carries the revision traces and receipts of each proofreading round. Multilingual materials enter as pairs of source text and translated names, the terminology list enters by entry, language, and source, and the comparison draft enters with paragraph-level alignment. The update rhythm advances with the proofreading rounds; each proofreading round produces a new version, and old versions are retained for traceability. When materials enter knowledge base retrieval and recall, the three-stage review form and proofreading records provide process and approval clues, the proof and comparison draft provide terminology wording and translated-name evidence, and the terminology list provides the baseline for standard wording. Field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts, and the same record should be able to cross-reference each other across different materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate chunks and similarity scores (after mode, merge, re-rank, filter, and limit trimming). Unifying the terminology list and comparison draft is then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Three-stage review form | Fields, dates, and signatures should be consistent among the three-stage review form, proof, and proofreading records; the name, quantity, and date of the same record must not mismatch | In the search test, retrieve once each with a terminology question and a synonymous rewritten question, check the number of candidate entries and scores under searchMode, then compare whether the name, quantity, date, and signature of the three-stage review form and proofreading records cross-reference each other |
| Proof | The terminology wording in the proof should be consistent with the unified terminology list, translated names can refer back to the source text, and the version must be synchronized with the current proofreading round | Switch searchMode to compare semantic and full-text candidates, check whether the proof chunks retain the key source sentences, and verify the correspondence between translated names and the source text as well as the version marker |
| Proofreading record | The revision traces and receipts of each proofreading round should be complete; records missing signatures or receipts must not enter external release | Enable and disable usingReRank to compare the ordering of the first few entries, check the receipt and signature fields of the proofreading records, and confirm that candidate chunks cover the revision traces |
| Terminology list and comparison draft | The same term should be written consistently throughout, translated names can refer back to the source text, and three terms should be sampled to check the wording throughout | Use similarity and limit to observe the number of candidate entries and scores, and sample three terms to check the wording and translated-name back-reference in the full-text candidates |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same proofreading record mismatch between the three-stage review form and the proof. Cause: Multi-version materials are not synchronized, and retrieval candidates are mixed with old-version chunks.
- Phenomenon: The terminology list has been updated, but the proof and comparison draft still use old translated names, and the same term is written inconsistently throughout. Cause: Versions are not synchronized, and recalled candidates are not filtered by the current proofreading round.
- Phenomenon: The proofreading record lacks signatures or receipts, yet the external release draft is still adopted. Cause: Approval fields do not enter candidate verification, and manual cross-reference to the three-stage review form is not performed.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: test once each with synonymous rewritten questions, compare candidates and similarity scores, then toggle re-rank to inspect the ordering of the first few entries, and record the number of candidate entries and scores.
Business testing: sample three terms to check whether the wording is consistent throughout, whether translated names can refer back to the source text, and verify the fields, dates, and signatures of the three-stage review form, proof, and proofreading records.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchMode, use semantic, full-text, and hybrid retrieval respectively on the same terminology question, record the number of candidate entries and scores, and check whether both semantic and full-text results are included. - Enable and disable
usingReRankto compare the ordering of the first few entries, usesimilarityandlimitto observe the tokens of the cited text after filtering and trimming, and record the array length separately.