What this category's data looks like
This category's data covers three types of materials: daily life schedules, morning and afternoon check records, and child health observation records. Sources are class teachers, health workers, and shift handovers. The update rhythm is daily morning, noon, before departure, and at shift handover time points. The daily life schedule provides fields for activity time slots, segments, and responsible persons; the morning and afternoon check records provide fields for child name, body temperature, oral and skin observations, date, and signature; the child health observation records provide fields for observation items, handling measures, parent receipts, and signatures. When materials enter the knowledge base retrieval function, the schedule serves as process basis fragments, the morning and afternoon check records serve as current-day status fragments, and the health observation records serve as individual tracking fragments. Each participates in recall as an independent document, for subsequent nodes or manual organization into handover materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate fragments and similarity scores (after mode, merge, re-rank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). The handover-ready deployment status and operation records are completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Daily life schedule | Fields include activity time slots, segment names, responsible persons, date, and signature; the names, quantities, and dates must be consistent with the morning and afternoon check records and health observation records | In the knowledge base search test, use the schedule segment name and date as the query, check whether candidate fragments cover the corresponding time slot, and record the number of candidates and scores |
| Morning and afternoon check records | Fields include child name, body temperature, oral and skin observations, date, signature, and receipt; the names, quantities, and dates of the same record in the two materials must match | Search using child name plus date as the query, check whether the names, quantities, and dates in candidate fragments are consistent with the schedule, and record the number of candidates and scores |
| Child health observation records | Fields include observation items, handling measures, parent receipts, and signatures; versions must be synchronized, and missing signatures or receipts indicate inconsistency | Search using observation item plus date as the query, check whether candidate fragments contain receipt and signature fields, and record the number of candidates and scores |
| Retrieval parameters | searchMode matches the material form under the three-choice mode, changes in the ranking of the first few items are observable after usingReRank is enabled, and similarity and limit control filtering and trimming | In the knowledge base search test, switch searchMode and compare candidate results; toggle usingReRank to observe the order of the first few items; adjust similarity and limit to observe changes in the number of candidates and scores |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match between the schedule and the morning and afternoon check records. Cause: Before materials enter retrieval, they were not compared item by item according to category verification dimensions, and fields and dates were not aligned.
- Symptom: The versions of health observation records are not synchronized, and old-version receipts and new-version observation items are mixed in the candidates. Cause: After document updates, they did not re-enter the retrieval process, and candidate fragments still come from the old version.
- Symptom: Morning and afternoon check records lack signatures or receipts, and one record is missing when checking the handover form item by item. Cause: When archiving materials, signature and receipt fields were not checked, so the candidate fragments returned by retrieval naturally lack the corresponding content.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: test once each with synonym-rewritten queries, compare candidates and similarity scores, then toggle re-rank to observe the order of the first few items; check changes in the number of candidates and scores under the four parameters searchMode, usingReRank, similarity, and limit, record the number of citations separately by array length, and record the tokens of the cited text separately.
Business test: check once item by item according to the handover form to see which record is missing; check whether the fields, dates, and signatures of the daily life schedule, morning and afternoon check records, and child health observation records are consistent, and whether versions are synchronized.
- In the knowledge base search test, construct queries separately using the schedule segment name, the morning and afternoon check child name, and the health observation item, record the number of candidates and scores, and compare the names, quantities, and dates of the three materials item by item.
- Switch
searchModeand toggleusingReRankto observe changes in the order of the first few items; adjustsimilarityandlimit, check the number of candidates and scores, and confirm that the tokens of the cited text and the array count are recorded separately.