What this category's data looks like
This page is intended for kindergarten game activity organization scenarios, focusing on citation sources and traceability in the deployment, operations, and application handover stages. The materials include: observation records, area plans, material placement checklists, activity objectives, reflection records, and next week's plans. Observation records correspond to area plans and are used to check whether activity objectives have been implemented; the material placement quantity checklist is used to determine whether materials are sufficient; reflection records are used to transcribe next week's plans. After these materials enter the knowledge base retrieval node, each plays a different role: observation records and objectives serve as sources of cited snippets, area plans and material checklists serve as comparison bases, and reflections and next week's plans serve as sources of fields for the handover ledger. The update cadence is once before each shift handover, and field characteristics include version number, connection status, task records, citation count, and source identifier. When materials enter this function, the cited content array is responsible for traceability, and subsequent nodes use it to compare fields, write the ledger, and generate reports.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs a cited content array, each item containing the original text snippet and source identifier, and the length may be 0. The handover-ready deployment status and operation records are completed next by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Even if no content is found, the output chain still runs through.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Observation records | Correspond to the area plan and are consistent with the achievement of activity objectives | Open the conversation citation marker, compare it with the source document, and check whether the observation record snippet can point back to the original paragraph |
| Material placement checklist | The material placement quantity is consistent with the quantity in the area plan | Check the checklist quantity against the planned quantity item by item, and record discrepancies |
| Area plan | The plan has been updated to this week and connects with the reflection-to-next-week plan | Check the plan version number and update time, and verify whether last week's reflection has been incorporated |
| Cited content output | The number of returned items is consistent with the matched materials; being empty is also normal | Run a test with a question that has no matching materials, and see whether the output is empty while the chain continues; check the responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) and quoteList fields |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The material placement quantity is insufficient, and the activity cannot be carried out as planned. Cause: The material checklist was not updated in sync with the area plan, and the quantity was not checked during handover.
- Symptom: The activity objectives do not match the observation records; the objectives were recorded as achieved despite the missing observation evidence. Cause: The observation records did not point back to the original paragraph, and the objectives were disconnected from the observations.
- Symptom: The reflection was not converted into next week's plan, and the plan was not updated. Cause: The handover form lacks the reflection-to-plan field, and the version and task records are inconsistent.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance check: ask a question with original text support, and check whether the citation array and marker can point back to the original text; then ask a question with no matching materials, and confirm that the array is empty while the chain runs through. Check the citation count in responseData and the source identifier in quoteList; the citation count is the array length, and quoteMaxToken is the citation content budget. Do not compare the two for equality.
Business test: check item by item once according to the handover form, and see which record is missing. Check whether the version, connection, and task records are consistent, and mark missing items as to be supplemented.
- Open the search parameter panel and check item by item, confirming that the associated knowledge base is a knowledge base using the same vector model.
- Open the citation marker in the conversation, compare it with the source document, and check whether each citation can point back to the original paragraph.