What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on the scenarios of student status changes and graduation eligibility review, organizing three types of materials—leave-of-absence and return-to-school applications, major transfer applications, and graduation review checklists—as well as the version records, connection configurations, and task ledgers required for deployment, operations, and handover. Leave-of-absence and return-to-school applications provide the reason for the change, effective date, and approval signature; major transfer applications provide the transferring-in and transferring-out majors, course recognition, and dates; graduation review checklists provide credits, completion status of required courses, and review conclusions. After these materials enter the knowledge base retrieval node, each serves as a citable source of original text fragments, used for subsequent field comparison, ledger writing, and report generation. The update cadence of materials varies with semester change windows and graduation review batches, and field characteristics center on name, student ID, major name, date, and signature field. The same record having mismatched names, quantities, or dates across two materials, versions not being synchronized, and missing signatures or receipts are common inconsistencies.
Configuration and implementation checks
This link is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of cited content, each entry containing an original text fragment and a source identifier, and the length can be 0. The handover-ready deployment status and operation records must be completed subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Leave-of-absence and return-to-school application | Check whether the reason for the change, effective date, and approval signature are complete, and whether the name, student ID, and date are consistent with those in the major transfer application | Open the citation marker to trace back to the original paragraph, compare fields and dates item by item, and record entries missing signatures or receipts |
| Major transfer application | Check the transferring-in and transferring-out majors, course recognition, and dates, and whether the major name and credit quantity match those in the graduation review checklist | Use quoteList to view the cited fragment, check the original paragraph and source identifier, and confirm version synchronization |
| Graduation review checklist | Check credits, completion status of required courses, and review conclusions, and whether the dates and signatures are consistent with those in the leave-of-absence and return-to-school application and the major transfer application | Check item by item according to the handover sheet, record the citation array length and the quoteMaxToken budget, and register them separately |
| Deployment status and operation records | Check whether the version, connection, and task records are consistent, and confirm that the citation source can be traced back | Use responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) to view the node output and confirm that the link still works when the array is empty |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same record has mismatched name, student ID, and date between the leave-of-absence and return-to-school application and the major transfer application. Cause: The two materials are entered separately and are not checked against the same field definitions.
- Symptom: The versions of the graduation review checklist and the major transfer application are not synchronized, and the cited fragment does not match the original text. Cause: After the materials were updated, they were not re-entered into the retrieval node, so the citation still points to the old paragraph.
- Symptom: The leave-of-absence and return-to-school application is missing a signature or receipt, the citation array is empty, but the link continues. Cause: The material was not uploaded or was not matched; an empty array is normal output and does not mean retrieval failed.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: ask a student status change question that has original text support, and check whether the citation array and markers can trace back to the original paragraph; then ask a question with no matching material, confirm that the array is empty while the link works, and record the array length and the quoteMaxToken budget separately.
Business test: check item by item once according to the handover sheet, see which item is missing from the records, and confirm that the version, connection, and task records are consistent.
- In the node, check whether the selected knowledge base collections and their vector models are consistent, and open the search parameter panel to check the values item by item.
- Run a trial with a question that has no matching material, see that the output is empty while the link continues, and then open the citation markers to compare against the source documents.