What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the student disciplinary action and appeal handling category. Materials include disciplinary fact materials, disciplinary decision documents, and appeal statements, sourced from student affairs and academic affairs business systems, with updates advancing according to semesters and disciplinary process milestones. Disciplinary fact materials record the course of conduct, time, location, and evidence; disciplinary decision documents carry the disciplinary level, the clauses relied upon, the effective date, and signatures/seals; appeal statements register the appeal request, reasons, acceptance status, and receipt. When these three types of materials enter the deployment environment and the administrator version upgrade page, each plays a different role: disciplinary fact materials serve as the original source of facts, disciplinary decision documents serve as proof of the handling result, and appeal statements serve as subsequent relief records. Field characteristics are concentrated in four categories: name, quantity, date, and signature. For the same record, inconsistencies often appear between disciplinary fact materials and disciplinary decision documents in name wording, quantity calibration, and date order, while appeal statements are prone to missing signatures or receipts. These materials do not automatically align due to image version updates and need to be checked item by item during operations handover.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is performed by the deployment environment and the administrator version upgrade page (server-side operation), outputting the image version, migration task records, and data row index status. "Handover-ready deployment status and operation records" are then completed by operations handover and business use. Migration scripts do not block service startup, and consistent image versions do not mean that business data migration has been completed.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Disciplinary fact materials | Name, quantity, date, and signature must correspond item by item with the disciplinary decision document; missing signature or receipt means inconsistency | Sample one record, compare the two materials for name, quantity, and date, and check whether signatures and receipts are complete |
| Disciplinary decision document | Disciplinary level, clauses relied upon, effective date, and signature/seal must be complete; when versions are not synchronized, dates easily conflict with the appeal statement | Check the signature/seal and effective date of the decision document, and confirm they do not contradict the acceptance date of the appeal statement |
| Appeal statement | Appeal request, reasons, acceptance status, and receipt must form a closed loop; missing receipt is regarded as incomplete handover | View the receipt field and confirm that the acceptance status connects with the date of the disciplinary decision document |
| Image version identifiers and migration task records | The two images are the same target version, the two migration scripts are executed in sequence, and records are traceable | Compare the version description to check the two image identifiers, check the two migration task records in order on the version upgrade page, and sample one data row to check the index status field; connection strings may refer to MONGODB_URI, PG_URL, REDIS_URL |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the service can start but the data row status is still the old marker. Cause: the image version has been updated, the migration scripts were not executed in sequence, and the index status was not switched.
- Symptom: for the same record, the name, quantity, and date in the disciplinary fact materials and the disciplinary decision document do not match. Cause: the two materials are entered at different stages, and versions are not synchronized.
- Symptom: the appeal statement lacks a signature or receipt, and records are found to be incomplete when checking the handover form. Cause: the acceptance stage did not backfill, and operations handover did not confirm item by item.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: check the two image version identifiers, then check the execution records of the two migration scripts in sequence, and confirm that the migration task records are consistent with the data row index status.
Business test: check item by item once according to the handover form to see which record is missing, focusing on signature, receipt, and date fields.
- On the version upgrade page, view the execution records of the two migration scripts and confirm the order dependency against time and status.
- Sample one data row to check the index status field, and check the signatures and receipts of the disciplinary fact materials, disciplinary decision document, and appeal statement.