What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of developing talent cultivation programs in vocational colleges. The materials include three types: talent cultivation programs, course standards, and job competency analysis tables. Talent cultivation programs come from academic affairs offices and professional teaching and research offices, are revised by academic year, and their fields include program name, program length, cultivation objectives, course modules, class hours and credits, signatures, and dates; course standards come from course teams, are updated by semester, and their fields include course name, objectives, content, class hours, assessment methods, author, and approval signature; job competency analysis tables come from enterprise research and professional construction committees, are updated by research cycle, and their fields include job name, competency items, corresponding courses, research date, and receipt. When these three types of materials enter the conversation logs and auditing function, they respectively serve the roles of program basis, course support, and job mapping. On this basis, the deployment, operations, and application handover stages retain operation records for item-by-item verification against the handover form.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the conversation record interface (by application and session dimension), which outputs a session message list and the total number of records, including role and reference information. "Handover-ready deployment status and operation records" are then completed manually or by an external system. The message list is not a version ledger of business materials; it serves only as conversation evidence for registration, export, and review.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Talent cultivation program | The program name, program length, number of course modules, revision date, and signature are consistent between the talent cultivation program and the course standards | Page through all records by application and session dimension, verify the session corresponding to chatId, and compare the fields of the talent cultivation program and the course standards |
| Course standards | The course name, class hours and credits, assessment method, author, and approval signature correspond between the course standards and the job competency analysis table | Open a single record to verify the role, reference information, and time, and verify the contents of the dataId and value fields |
| Job competency analysis table | The job name, number of competency items, corresponding courses, research date, and receipt are consistent between the analysis table and the talent cultivation program | Pull two consecutive pages to compare the total number of records and the offset, and confirm that response code of 200 matches the total number of records |
| Deployment status and operation records | Version, connection, and task records are consistent, and each item on the handover form has a corresponding record | Verify item by item against the handover form, and confirm that version, connection, and task records are complete |
Three common errors
- Symptom: For the same record, the course name, number of class hours, and revision date do not match between the talent cultivation program and the course standards. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately and are not synchronized to the same version, and the receipt is missing at handover.
- Symptom: The number of competency items in the job competency analysis table is inconsistent with the number of corresponding courses in the talent cultivation program. Cause: After the research, the program was not written back, the version was not synchronized, and the signature or receipt is missing.
- Symptom: The interface returns empty but there are sessions in the interface, or only the first page is retrieved, and the exported records lack references. Cause: The source of the application and session identifiers was not verified, and the pagination offset and total number of records were not compared.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: page through all records according to the total number of records, sample one record to verify the role, reference information, and time, confirm that response code of 200 matches the total number of records, and verify the message identifiers and content fields _id, dataId and value.
Business test: verify item by item against the handover form once, see which record is missing, and confirm that version, connection, and task records are consistent.
- In the request parameters, verify the source of the application and session identifiers, pull two consecutive pages to compare the total number of records and the offset, and confirm response
codeof 200. - Open a record to verify the role, reference, and elapsed time fields, confirm that the number of references is the array length, and verify the tokens for the reference content budget separately.