What this category's data looks like
This page is for modern apprenticeship and order class management scenarios. Materials include three categories: school-enterprise cooperation agreements, order class training plans, and master-apprentice records. School-enterprise cooperation agreements provide cooperation entities, terms, and signature fields; order class training plans provide courses, positions, and assessment milestones; master-apprentice records provide apprenticeship frequency, skill items, and signed receipts. Materials are updated by semester or training cycle. When entering the knowledge base retrieval and recall function, agreements and plans serve as the institutional basis, while apprenticeship records serve as process evidence. Together, the three support consistency verification of versions, connections, and task records during deployment, operations, and application handover.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate chunks and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, rerank, filter, and limit trimming). The handover-ready deployment status and operation records are completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| School-enterprise cooperation agreement | Check whether the names and dates of cooperation term, signature, and receipt fields are consistent across the two materials | In the search test, switch searchMode to hybrid, and view the number of agreement chunk candidates and scores |
| Order class training plan | Check whether the number of courses, positions, and assessment milestones match across the two materials | Compare the top few rankings before and after enabling usingReRank, and record the number of plan chunk candidates and scores |
| Master-apprentice record | Check whether apprenticeship frequency, skill items, and signed receipts are missing, and whether versions are synchronized | Adjust similarity to observe retention of apprenticeship record chunks, and separately record the number of citations |
| Citation limit trimming | Check that the tokens and array count of the cited text are recorded separately, without equality comparison | Check whether the cited text after limit trimming still retains key original chunks |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match between the agreement and the training plan. Cause: Materials are updated separately and not verified against the same version.
- Symptom: Master-apprentice records lack signatures or receipts. Cause: Process materials are not fully archived with the training cycle, and items are not verified one by one during handover.
- Symptom: The same question cannot be recalled when rephrased. Cause: Question optimization and recall mode do not cover that expression, and candidates and scores are not rechecked.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: Test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle rerank on and off to check the top few rankings.
Business test: Check item by item according to the handover list, and see which record is missing.
- In the search test, switch
searchModeand enableusingReRank, and record the number of candidates and scores. - Adjust
similarityandlimit, separately record the number of citations, and check the tokens of the cited text.