What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of reviewing registration for professional and technical personnel qualification examinations. The materials include the registration form, proof of education, and proof of work experience. The registration form carries basic personal information and the examination subjects applied for; the proof of education carries the graduating institution, major, certificate number, and date of issuance; the proof of work experience carries the position, start and end times, and the unit's signature and seal. When these three types of materials enter the knowledge base retrieval node, each is cited as an independent original text fragment, and the source identifier points back to the corresponding document. The update cadence advances with the review batches: the registration form changes with the version submitted by the candidate, the proof of education changes with certificate supplementation or correction, and the proof of work experience changes with issuance or supplementary signing by the unit. Field characteristics center on name, ID number, major name, date, signature, and receipt; the same record must keep names, quantities, and dates consistent across materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of cited content, each entry containing an original text fragment and a source identifier, and the length may be 0. The handover-ready deployment state and operation records are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. The number of citations is the array length, and quoteMaxToken is the citation content budget; the two are not compared for equality.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Registration form | Fields include name, ID number, examination subjects, and signature field; dates and signatures must match the proof of education and proof of work experience | Open the citation marker to point back to the original registration form, and check item by item whether name, ID number, subjects, dates, and signature are complete |
| Proof of education | Fields include graduating institution, major, certificate number, and date of issuance; the major name is consistent with what is filled in on the registration form, and the date is not earlier than the graduation time | Check the major name and date of issuance against the source document, and check whether the certificate number and receipt are missing |
| Proof of work experience | Fields include position, start and end times, and the unit's signature and seal; the start and end times are consistent with the work experience filled in on the registration form, and the signature/seal and receipt are complete | Check the start and end times and the position name, and check whether the unit's signature/seal and receipt have missing items |
| Citation content output | The number of returned entries is consistent with the matched materials; being empty is also normal, and the output chain still runs through | Run a test with a question that has no matching materials, see that the array is empty while the chain continues, and record responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) and quoteList |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the major name and graduation date of the same record do not match between the registration form and the proof of education. Cause: the versions of the two materials were not synchronized, or the original text was not checked by pointing back via the source identifier during entry.
- Symptom: the start and end times on the proof of work experience are inconsistent with the amount of work experience filled in on the registration form. Cause: the ledger was not updated after issuance by the unit, and the dates and quantities were not compared item by item during handover.
- Symptom: there is no citation marker in the answer, or the cited fragment does not match the original text. Cause: first check whether this round hit anything and which material was hit, then look at trimming, and do not directly attribute it to length trimming.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: ask a question with an original-text basis, and check whether the citation array and markers can point back to the original text; then ask a question with no matching materials, confirm that the array is empty while the chain runs through, and record quoteList within responseData.
Business testing: check item by item once according to the handover sheet, see which item is missing from the record, and confirm that the version, connection, and task record are consistent.
- Open the search parameter panel and check item by item, confirm that the values are consistent with those set in the knowledge base retrieval section, and check that the selected collections are the same as their vector models.
- Open the citation markers in the conversation, check against the source documents whether each citation can point back to the original text paragraph, and separately record the number of array entries and the tokens of the cited text.