What this category's data looks like
This category's data falls into three types: physical examination forms, re-examination applications, and restricted-major notifications. Physical examination forms record height and weight, vision and color perception, past medical history, internal medicine and surgery conclusions, and the chief examiner's signature; re-examination applications record the application date, re-examination items, the original conclusion and the re-examination conclusion, and the physician's signature; restricted-major notifications record the name of the restricted major, the clause on which the restriction is based, the notification date, and the receipt by the candidate or parent. The three types of materials enter the knowledge base retrieval node by admissions batch and re-examination round; physical examination forms carry the traceability of the initial examination conclusion, re-examination applications carry the traceability of conclusion changes, and restricted-major notifications carry the traceability of the notification obligation and receipt, each participating in citation output as an independent source identifier. The update cadence follows physical examination batches, re-examination notices, and the collection of notification receipts; field characteristics center on four types—dates, names, quantities, and signatures—and when comparing across materials, consistency among the three is the precondition for handover.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of citation content, each entry containing the original text snippet and a source identifier, and the length may be 0. The "handover-ready deployment status and operation records" are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. The associated knowledge base must use the same vector model, and the search parameters take the same values as in the knowledge base retrieval section.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Physical examination form | Initial examination conclusion fields: height and weight, vision and color perception, internal medicine and surgery conclusions, chief examiner's signature, and examination date are complete; if the name, quantity, or date of the same record does not match across the two materials, it is treated as pending verification | Open the citation marker to trace back to the original paragraph of the physical examination form, compare fields and signatures item by item, and record the number of citations and the quoteMaxToken budget |
| Re-examination application | Re-examination conclusion fields: application date, re-examination items, original conclusion and re-examination conclusion, and physician's signature are complete; if the version is not synchronized or the dates do not match, it is treated as pending verification | Open the citation marker in the conversation, compare against the source document of the re-examination application, and check whether the application and conclusion dates are consistent across materials |
| Restricted-major notification | Notification fields: name of the restricted major, clause on which the restriction is based, notification date, and receipt signature are complete; if the signature or receipt is missing, it is treated as pending verification | Run a trial with a question that has no matching material, confirm that the citation array is empty while the chain still runs, then check whether the notification receipt traces back to the original text |
| Citation content output | The number of returned entries matches the materials hit; empty is also normal; if the citation snippets do not match the original text, it is treated as pending verification | Inspect the citation array in responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) and quoteList, trace each entry back to the original paragraph, and record the number of entries separately without comparing it to the budget |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the item names, quantities, and dates for the same candidate do not match between the physical examination form and the re-examination application. Cause: the two rounds of materials were entered separately without cross-material comparison, and at handover only the completeness of a single material was checked.
- Symptom: the restricted-major notification has a notification date but lacks a receipt signature, or the receipt was not synchronized with the batch. Cause: notification and receipt belong to different steps, and versions were not synchronized, resulting in missing records on the handover form.
- Symptom: there is no citation marker in the answer, or an answer exists but the citation array is empty and is mistaken for retrieval failure. Cause: failure to distinguish an empty array as normal output from no matching material, and failure to first check which material was hit in this round.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: ask a question that has original-text support and check whether the citation array and markers can trace back to the original text; then ask a question with no matching material, confirm that the array is empty while the chain still runs, and inspect the number of citations in quoteList within responseData and the quoteMaxToken budget, recording them separately.
Business test: check item by item against the handover form once, see which record is missing, verify whether the version, connection, and task record are consistent, then hand over to operations or the next shift.
- In the node, check whether the selected knowledge base collections and their vector models are the same vector model, and open the search parameter panel to verify the values item by item
- Run a trial with a question that has no matching material, see that the output is empty while the chain continues, then open the citation marker and trace each entry back to the original text against the source document