Deployment and Upgrade for Securities Intelligent Due Diligence Reports

Securities intelligent due diligence report data mainly comes from channels such as exchange public disclosure documents, listed company periodic

What the data for this category looks like

Securities intelligent due diligence report data mainly comes from channels such as exchange public disclosure documents, listed company periodic reports, special broker research reports, and regulatory agency compliance announcements. Disclosure files update on a fixed schedule based on trading hours. Research reports and compliance announcements update when events are triggered. Documents contain structured fields and unstructured text. Structured fields include security code, disclosure date, revenue scale, asset-liability ratio, and more. Units are mostly yuan, ten thousand yuan, or percentage. Unstructured text covers long-form content such as related transaction details and compliance rectification explanations.

What constraints these characteristics impose on deployment and upgrade

Multi-source heterogeneous data sources require configuring multi-data source synchronization rules during deployment, and adapting scheduling logic for different update frequencies. Differences in document length and structure require retaining compatibility with old parsing templates during upgrades, to avoid damaging configured field extraction rules. Specific field units require configuring normalization conversion logic during deployment, and field mapping rules cannot be modified arbitrarily during upgrades. The compliance attribute of securities data requires binding permission verification configurations during deployment. Permission association settings cannot be lost during upgrades, otherwise data leakage risks may arise.

How to set configurations

Configuration ItemRecommended ValueRationale
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS300-600 secondsSecurities due diligence reports are mostly long documents. Sufficient time is needed to parse structured and unstructured text to avoid parsing interruptions
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE2000 MBSingle annual reports or bulk research report packages have large file sizes. This setting adapts to large file upload and parsing requirements
maxContext8000-12000 charactersDue diligence reports need to retain complete context for related transactions and compliance records, to avoid truncation of critical decision-making information
Recall CountTop 8-12 entriesSecurities due diligence requires coverage of multi-dimensional disclosure documents. Too many recalled entries increase inference latency, too few miss critical compliance points
SYNC_SCHEDULE_CRON0 2 * * *Exchange disclosure files mostly update outside trading hours. Synchronizing daily at 2 AM ensures data timeliness

The parameter values provided on this page are common starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material format, data volume and business rules. Specific issues require targeted analysis. It is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing settings.

Three Common Mistakes

  • Phenomenon: After upgrading to version 4.8.17, an error occurs when loading visual chart components, with a 500 status code returned. Cause: Old dependency configuration files for chart rendering were not retained during the upgrade. The new version enables a new rendering engine by default, which is incompatible with the chart data format of existing due diligence reports.
  • Phenomenon: In a Docker deployment environment, external model-connected knowledge bases remain in the indexing state continuously. Cause: The INDEX_BATCH_SIZE parameter was not configured reasonably. The batch indexing threshold was set too high, and network access rules were not adapted, causing the indexing process to block.
  • Phenomenon: In version 4.6.9, the output field of the HTTP request orchestration node cannot be displayed in conversation results. Cause: The ENABLE_HTTP_OUTPUT_VISIBLE configuration item was not enabled. By default, the output of orchestration nodes is only used for internal data flow and not exposed to the conversation terminal.

How to confirm configuration is correct

  • Upload a listed company annual report for local parsing testing. Verify that extracted fields such as security code and disclosure date are complete. Adjust PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS until parsing completes without exceptions.
  • Trigger a manual synchronization task. Check the knowledge base indexing progress panel to confirm the task completes within a reasonable time, with no persistent hanging state. Adjust SYNC_SCHEDULE_CRON and INDEX_BATCH_SIZE to adapt to synchronization frequency.
  • Start an HTTP orchestration test node, call a preset interface, and check if the orchestration node's output content is displayed on the conversation terminal. Confirm that the ENABLE_HTTP_OUTPUT_VISIBLE configuration item is enabled as required.
  • Export workflow configuration files from the old version, attempt to import them into the new version system, confirm the import is successful and workflow node connections have no abnormalities. Verify workflow compatibility after version upgrade.

Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.