What the data for this category looks like
Military electronics research reports primarily originate from military-focused teams at securities firm research institutes, national defense technology industry think tanks, and periodic reports and temporary announcements publicly released by military industry groups. Updates follow a quarterly rhythm for regular reports, with temporary updates triggered by major industry events.
Document structures typically include sub-sector prosperity analysis, performance parameters for core components such as military radio frequency chips and military circuit boards, and revenue and order data for core enterprises. Fields include report publishing institution, publishing date, target code, quantitative indicators with clear units, and some reports include excerpts of original industry policy documents.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on the citation source and traceability link
The multi-source citation nature of military electronics research reports requires the traceability link to support multi-level association. It must point to the original research report file, and also extract and mark secondary sources such as public data from industry regulatory authorities and military group announcements cited in the report.
This category of research reports includes quantitative indicators with clear units. The traceability link must display the unit information for corresponding fields to avoid confusion between units such as 100 million yuan and 10,000 yuan.
Temporary event-based research reports have strong timeliness. Traceability must be linked to the report publishing timestamp to ensure cited content does not exceed the valid public disclosure period.
At the same time, some sub-sectors have restrictions on public data release channels. Traceability must match the knowledge base permission scope to ensure compliance of cited data sources.
How to set the configuration
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
chunk_size | 800–1200 characters | Military electronics research reports contain long technical analysis paragraphs and quantitative tables. This segment length preserves complete context for individual technical parameters or enterprise data, preventing loss of associated information after splitting |
recall_count | 5–7 | Military electronics research reports have strong correlation between sub-sectors. Too many recall results introduce redundant content from unrelated sub-sectors, while too few fail to cover core analysis logic |
rerank_count | 3–4 | Prioritize retaining research report fragments directly related to specific military electronics components, then filter non-core recall results after reranking |
source_display_fields | ["发布机构","发布日期","量化单位"] | Traceability for military electronics research reports requires clear source entities, publishing timeliness, and quantitative indicator units to ensure cited content is traceable and free of unit confusion |
upload_max_size | 20 MB | Single in-depth military electronics research reports typically include large numbers of charts and data tables. This upper limit accommodates complete multi-page research report files, avoiding truncation of key content |
rag_max_context | 16000–24000 token | Military electronics research reports have strong contextual correlation. A larger context window accommodates multiple recalled research report fragments, ensuring coherent analysis logic |
The parameter values provided on this page are conventional recommendations used to establish a starting point for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume and business rules. Specific issues require targeted analysis. It is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing configuration settings.
Three common mistakes
- After importing multiple military electronics research reports, retrieval only returns 1 citation result, and the interface shows Knowledge Base Citations (1 entry). Cause: The
recall_countconfiguration value is too low, or the similarity threshold is set too high, filtering out other relevant research report fragments. - After configuring the large language model and embedding model, an error prompt appears during the test process. Ignoring the error still allows normal generation of citation traceability results. Cause: There is a deviation in the pre-verification logic of the test link for version 4.8.20 and later. Temporary network fluctuations in the model interface will trigger an error, but will not block the subsequent RAG link.
- Some military electronics research report files are imported without generating split question-answer pairs, and are stored directly in the knowledge base as original text fragments. Cause: The automatic question-answer pair generation function is not enabled, or the file is in scanned format and cannot be split semantically, resulting in direct storage as original text in the knowledge base.
How to verify successful configuration
- Upload a single in-depth military electronics research report, check the segmented content parsed by the knowledge base, and confirm that no key technical parameters or quantitative data have been truncated.
- Initiate a retrieval for a military electronics sub-sector, review the citation source module of the returned answer, and confirm that the source field information specified in the configuration is displayed.
- Import multiple research report files from the same sub-sector, count the number of citation results after retrieval, and confirm that the count falls within the range defined by the preset recall and rerank configurations.
- Run the model test process, confirm that there are no abnormal errors in the test link, or that answers with complete traceability information can still be generated normally after errors occur.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.