What data for this category looks like
Data for this category typically comes from urban management law enforcement platforms, urban operation grid platforms, video surveillance systems, and public complaint work orders. The update frequency is daily. Common documents include inspection records, case filing approval forms, on-site photos, rectification order notices, penalty decisions, and case closure reports. Data fields usually include case number, inspection time, violation type, responsible entity, rectification status, and similar items. Most data combines structured fields with unstructured images and document files.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on the HTTP interface and external system link
Data sources for this category are scattered, and include both structured fields and unstructured images and document files. This requires HTTP interfaces to support synchronization and parsing of multiple data types. The daily update frequency requires interface calls to adapt to peak business hours to avoid timeouts or data loss. Case-associated file sizes vary widely, so the interface must support large file transfers or segmented upload logic. Case data formats from different sources are inconsistent, so standardization adaptation must be completed at the interface layer to ensure consistent processing in the downstream service consultation and reply link.
How to configure
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Authorization | Bearer {Urban Management Law Enforcement Platform API Key} | Complies with industry interface authentication standards, used to complete identity verification between external systems and FastGPT |
| Request timeout | 600 seconds | Processes such as evidence collection and approval for case handling take a long time, so sufficient interface response time must be reserved |
variables | Pass core business fields such as case number, violation type, and rectification status | Service consultation requires generating accurate replies based on specific case information, so accurate business variables must be passed |
responseData | Return structured case details, rectification status, and standardized reply templates | External systems can directly obtain reusable business data without additional parsing and processing |
| Retry count | 2-3 times | Network fluctuations may cause interface call failures, and limited retries can reduce the risk of lost orders |
| Large file processing rules | Upload files to temporary storage first, then pass the file ID | Unstructured files such as on-site photos have large sizes, and direct transmission may cause timeouts or packet loss |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Phenomenon: Returns an error in the format
{"code":514,"statusText":"xxx"}when calling the interface. Cause: TheAuthorizationparameter is not configured correctly, or the passed case identification format does not meet the interface requirements. - Phenomenon: The interface return result does not include the business fields of the corresponding case. Cause: Core business parameters are not passed in
variables, causing the system to fail to associate with specific case data. - Phenomenon: No result is returned for a long time after calling the interface. Cause: A reasonable request timeout is not set, or large files do not use segmented upload logic, resulting in transmission timeout.
How to Confirm Configuration is Complete
- Pass a test case number, call the interface, and check whether the core fields of the corresponding case are included in
responseDatato confirm that the data association logic is normal. - Simulate the call frequency during peak business hours, check whether the interface can respond stably, and confirm that the timeout and retry configurations are effective.
- Upload a test on-site photo file, check whether the interface can correctly receive and return the file ID, and confirm that the large file processing logic is normal.
- View the interface log, confirm that the
Authorizationparameter is correctly parsed, and there are no abnormalities in the authentication link.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.