Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
What this category of data looks like
This category of business data is sourced from four core data sets: engineering quality and safety supervision systems, on-site construction real-name platforms, supervision logs, and test reports. The update frequency is weekly. Daily generated documents and materials include supervision plans, supervision inspection records, hidden danger rectification notices, quality problem handling forms, and completion acceptance supervision reports. Each document includes fixed fields such as business subject information, on-site inspection items, rectification requirements, and closed-loop status. There are no unified standardized unit fields, and corresponding measurement rules must be matched based on specific inspection items.
What Constraints These Characteristics Impose on Workflow Orchestration
The weekly update cycle of multiple data sources requires the workflow to use a fixed trigger interval, to avoid frequent calls that exceed system capacity limits. The fixed field requirements for multiple document types require the workflow to include field verification rules, to ensure that key information such as hidden danger rectification closed-loop status is fully passed between steps. The time-consuming nature of on-site inspection and rectification tracking requires the workflow to set reasonable timeout thresholds, to prevent process blocking. The high severity of errors requires the workflow to include failure branches, to trigger alerts when data acquisition exceptions or verification failures occur. Use of settings that directly terminate the workflow must be done with caution.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Global variable configuration | Bind variables from the engineering quality and safety supervision system and real-name platform | Integrate weekly business data from multiple sources, ensure the workflow can access the latest on-site inspection information |
| Node trigger timing | Trigger when the workflow starts | Match the weekly data update business rhythm, avoid data inconsistency caused by non-periodic triggers |
| Knowledge base recall limit | Top 8 entries | Match the document length of a single supervision inspection record, avoid recalling excessive redundant content |
| Node timeout setting | 600 seconds | Cover the average time range of on-site material inspection, avoid process interruption due to short delays |
| Maximum context length | 8000-12000 token | Cover the full content volume of a single completion acceptance supervision report, ensure the AI-generated document has complete information |
| Node ID configuration | Bind nodeId to the rectification closed-loop verification node | Precisely control the process branch of hidden danger rectification, ensure the next link is entered only after the closed-loop status meets requirements |
Three Common Configuration Mistakes
- Scenario: The workflow throws an "Failed to obtain global variables" error during execution, or the
variablesfield is empty. Cause: The data source of the engineering quality and safety supervision system was not correctly bound in the workflow configuration, and hidden danger data returned by the third-party API was not written to the global variable storage. - Scenario: The workflow terminates halfway through execution, and the scenario triggered by a specific problem can be reproduced. Cause: The branch verification logic corresponding to
nodeIdwas not configured. When the hidden danger rectification status field is empty, the workflow terminates directly without triggering subsequent processing nodes. - Scenario: The knowledge base search node returns 0 results. Cause: The recall scope was not limited to exclusive documents for construction engineering quality and safety supervision, general knowledge base content was incorrectly called, and fields exclusive to documents such as supervision plans and rectification notices were not matched.
How to Verify Proper Configuration
- Trigger the workflow start node, check the global variable panel, confirm that the data sources of the engineering quality and safety supervision system and real-name platform have successfully loaded
variables. - Manually enter keywords for supervision inspection records, run the knowledge base search node, confirm that the recall results include exclusive documents of this category.
- Simulate a delay exceeding 600 seconds to trigger node timeout, confirm that the workflow triggers an alert and executes the preset failure handling logic.
- Check the rectification closed-loop verification node corresponding to
nodeId, confirm that the verification rules for the hidden danger rectification status field have been correctly bound.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.