What This Category of Data Looks Like
Daily documents for this category include territorial spatial master plans, detailed plans, special plans, planning implementation evaluation reports, public opinion summaries, and more. Data sources cover territorial spatial basic information platforms, natural resource survey and monitoring data, population and economic statistics data, and remote sensing imagery. Most data contains fields such as regional spatial boundary coordinates, facility layout points, binding indicators, and approval node numbers. Document structures typically combine structured tables with spatial attachments. Updates follow an annual cycle, with large single data volumes involving multi-format business materials and files. Some documents include vector layer attachments, and field precision requirements are strict.
Constraints Imposed on Workflow Orchestration by These Characteristics
The volume and format differences of multi-source data require workflows to include staged parsing and aggregation nodes to prevent single-context overload. Annually updated data sources need regular synchronization rules configured to ensure data called by workflows aligns with the latest planning requirements. Complex document structures require workflows to support multi-format parsing components to accommodate mixed input of spatial attachments and text materials. The rigor of file review also requires workflows to include circulation verification nodes to ensure declaration materials are complete and avoid issues such as approval delays. Additionally, this category handles planning content covering entire regions and multi-year constraints, so workflows must support long-cycle node circulation and multi-round data verification to match the business logic of planning compilation.
Configuration Settings
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
variables | Bind example value and planning scope coordinate variables | Meet prompt signature time requirements and associate business-specific data fields |
| Node timeout setting | 1200 seconds | Adapt to the time required for single spatial data parsing and multi-source data aggregation |
| RAG knowledge base binding | Bind territorial spatial planning standard library and regional basic data subset | Match category-specific documents and data sources |
| MCP tool call configuration | Call spatial data verification and opinion summary tools in nodeId order | Align with the business process sequence of planning compilation |
| Single search limit | Top 8 entries | Avoid overloading workflow context with excessive spatial data |
| Data source synchronization cycle | 1 year | Match the annual update frequency of category data |
| Context length limit | 8000 token | Adapt to parsing requirements for multi-source mixed documents |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Workflow execution displays the "context length exceeded" prompt. Cause: No context length limit is set, or the single search limit is too high, resulting in loading too many territorial spatial planning documents and remote sensing imagery data.
- Shared links cannot be accessed normally. Cause: The corresponding authentication switch is not enabled in the workflow sharing configuration, or the configured permission rules do not match business department requirements.
- Approval delay markers appear after workflow circulation. Cause: No file material integrity verification node is configured, and public opinion summary documents are omitted.
How to Confirm Correct Configuration
- Test workflow operation and check if the prompt signature time matches the system's current date.
- Trigger a RAG call and confirm that returned documents come from the bound territorial spatial planning exclusive knowledge base.
- Check the workflow sharing configuration page and confirm that the authentication switch is enabled and matches department permission rules.
- Attempt to export independent nodes bound to MCP tools and confirm that the exported file format meets business archiving requirements.
- View the data source synchronization configuration and confirm that the synchronization cycle matches the annual update rhythm of category data.
The values listed here are common starting points and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.