What the data for this category looks like
Data for this category typically comes from risk control systems, audit records, user behavior logs, and report evidence. Daily processed documents include ban records, appeal materials, review opinions, and user notifications. Ban records contain fields for account identifiers, violation types, disposal times, and disposal levels. Appeal materials include supporting content and written descriptions submitted by users. Review opinions contain audit identifiers, judgment results, and adjustment bases. Data updates occur daily or in real time. Most fields use string, timestamp, and enumeration value types.
What constraints these characteristics impose on sharing and embedding
Real-time data requirements limit data source synchronization cycles. Synchronization must match daily or real-time update rhythms. Expired ban and appeal data must not be used. Synchronization is controlled by external business systems. Documents contain sensitive account identifiers and audit details. Field filtering rules must be configured when sharing via calls. Only compliant fields can be exposed for external access. Document structures vary significantly across types. Corresponding document categories must be specified during embedding calls. This ensures retrieved content aligns with the current account ban and appeal scenario. Category rules are configured by the external knowledge base. Data sources include user behavior logs. Embedding calls must comply with data usage standards. User privacy information must not be exposed.
How to configure settings
This configuration is based on FastGPT's non-login sharing and embedding capabilities. Relevant data processing is completed by external business systems and the knowledge base.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Sharing entry shareId | Copy the full share link generated by the system; do not replace the identifier manually | Identifies the sharing entry; business records and data permissions for account ban and appeal review must still be processed by external systems |
| Share link validity period | Test starting point: 7 days; adjust based on actual testing of account ban and appeal review collaboration cycles and revocation requirements | Validates availability during the valid period and access behavior after expiration; this value is not an official default or industry statistic |
| QPM | Test starting point: 20 requests per user per minute; adjust based on actual load | Limits access frequency for individual users; must be verified combined with request logs and actual load |
| Identity verification | When identity permission requirements exist, first verify commercial edition capabilities and the uid returned by the third-party identity service | Holding a share link does not equate to having business data permissions; third-party identity and data scope must be verified separately |
| Referenced content display | Select display configurations for reference fragments, full text, and original text based on the sensitivity of account ban and appeal review materials | Checks displayed content within authorized data ranges; hidden interfaces cannot replace data permission controls |
| Conversation record verification | Test example: Prepare 10 account ban and appeal review Q&A samples; check them in the same browser and another device respectively | Anonymous records rely on browser local identity; retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearance |
Three common mistakes
- Sharing entries related to account ban and appeal review fail to open. First verify the full system-generated link and its validity period. Then check browser request statuses. Do not manually replace
shareId. - The visible scope of account ban and appeal review data does not match expectations. Verify third-party identity verification results, workflow request parameters, and external system data permissions separately. The sharing entry identifier itself does not provide business authorization.
- The same account ban and appeal review Q&A is not visible on another device. In anonymous scenarios, first check device, browser, and local identity status. Record retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearance. Do not use this phenomenon alone to judge service abnormalities.
How to confirm configuration is properly set up
- Initiate a call via the corresponding non-login share link. Check that returned document fields only include preset compliant fields. Commercial editions must complete third-party identity verification integration.
- Trigger external data source synchronization. Confirm that knowledge base updates match the latest ban record data. Synchronization cycles are controlled by external systems.
- Embed the configured component on the test page. Verify that the page loads normally and no permission errors appear.
- Enter simulated account ban inquiries. Check that retrieved documents all match the category-specific rules configured by the external knowledge base for this category.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.