What data for this category looks like
This category’s data primarily comes from customer system APIs, API documentation, test data, and integration debugging logs. Update frequency follows a daily schedule or aligns with phase delivery milestones. Daily associated documents include API lists, integration records, field mapping tables, and issue tracking sheets. Most data fields include API addresses, request parameters, response formats, error code definitions, and business mapping rules. There are no standardized fixed units; values adjust based on the field specifications of the connected external system. Integration engineers and backend developers regularly use this data to confirm field definitions, troubleshoot call chains, and similar tasks.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on sharing and embedding workflows?
The characteristics of this category’s data impose multiple constraints on the sharing and embedding workflow. First, most data originates from real-time APIs and dynamic logs. Maintaining call permissions and data timeliness is required after embedding. Teams limit the access scope and validity period of sharing links to meet this need. Second, multiple structured documents are regularly associated. In embedding scenarios, teams synchronously load corresponding integration records and field mapping table content. FastGPT sharing configuration items control contextual loading rules. Connected external systems provide associated document content. Additionally, no unified units apply to fields. Teams retain the original system’s field formats after embedding to avoid definition conversion errors. Furthermore, data updates occur frequently. FastGPT sharing configuration items control the cache duration of embedded content. Connected external systems must provide the latest integration debugging data to support content updates.
How to set up configurations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Sharing entry shareId | Copy the full sharing link generated by the system; do not manually replace the identifier | Identifies the sharing entry; business records and data permissions for API integration and data connectivity tasks remain managed by the external system |
| Sharing link validity period | Test starting point: 7 days; adjust based on actual API integration and data connectivity collaboration cycles and revocation requirements | Verify availability within the valid period and access behavior after expiration; this value is not an official default or industry statistic |
| QPM | Test starting point: 20 requests per user per minute; adjust based on actual load | Limits access frequency for a single user; requires validation combined with request logs and actual load |
| Identity verification | When identity permission requirements exist, first verify commercial edition capabilities and the uid returned by the third-party identity service | Holding a sharing link does not equal having business data permissions; third-party identity and data scope must be verified separately |
| Referenced content display | Select display configurations for reference fragments, full text, or original text based on the sensitivity of API integration and data connectivity materials | Check displayed content within authorized data ranges; do not use hidden interfaces as a replacement for data permission controls |
| Conversation record verification | Test example: Prepare 10 API integration and data connectivity Q&A samples; check each on the same browser and a separate device | Anonymous records rely on local browser identity; retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearance |
Three common mistakes
- Sharing entries related to API integration and data connectivity fail to open. First verify the full system-generated link and its validity period, then check browser request statuses. Do not manually replace
shareId. - The visible scope of API integration and data connectivity data does not match expectations. Verify third-party identity verification results, workflow request parameters, and external system data permissions separately. The sharing entry identifier itself does not provide business authorization.
- The same API integration and data connectivity Q&A entry is not visible on a separate device. For anonymous scenarios, first check device, browser, and local identity status. Record retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearance; do not use this phenomenon alone to judge service anomalies.
How to confirm configurations are set correctly
- Access the sharing link to verify that the validity prompt matches the configured duration.
- Use an unauthorized identity to access the sharing link, confirm that access is blocked.
- Update the integration debugging logs in the external system, refresh the embedded page, confirm that the latest content displays correctly.
- Call the third-party speech recognition function integrated on the embedded page, confirm that no permission error prompts appear.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be measured against the reader’s own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.